From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] nvmet: EUI64 support
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 09:52:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180509075253.GA21148@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180509094529.2fb1cffe@pentland.suse.de>
On Wed, May 09, 2018@09:45:29AM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On Wed, 9 May 2018 09:08:58 +0200
> "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 04, 2018@01:28:41PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > > Allow the setting of an IEEE Extended Unique Identifier (EUI64) for
> > > each namespace. As the OUI is per subsystem ensure that the OUI
> > > part of the EUI64 value (ie the top 3 bytes) are matching for each
> > > namespace.
> >
> > I don't think we should support the EUI64 value. It doesn't have
> > a lot of uniqueness, and it requires and IEEE OID to be properly
> > implemented. Please use the UUID identifier always, unless you
> > actually doe havean IEEE OID and really want to use it, in which case
> > you should use the NGUID.
> >
>
> It's not so much about usability, it's about choice.
> Some users might want to set an EUI64; companies (like ours) have
> a valid OUI, so generating an EUI64 is pretty simple.
>
> And the patch itself is pretty simple, so where's the harm?
Please always use the NGUID then. Using a 64-bit unique
identifier is a bad idea. And even when using NGUIDs you have to
be extremely careful to make sure they are never reused.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-09 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-04 11:28 [RFC PATCH 0/5] nvme: ANA support Hannes Reinecke
2018-05-04 11:28 ` [PATCH 1/5] nvmet: EUI64 support Hannes Reinecke
2018-05-07 7:17 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-05-09 7:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-09 7:45 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-05-09 7:52 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-05-09 15:43 ` Ewan D. Milne
2018-05-04 11:28 ` [PATCH 2/5] nvme: Add ANA base definitions Hannes Reinecke
2018-05-04 16:17 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-04 17:03 ` Meneghini, John
2018-05-04 17:21 ` Knight, Frederick
2018-05-05 13:17 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-05-04 21:12 ` Schremmer, Steven
2018-05-09 7:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-04 11:28 ` [PATCH 3/5] nvmet: Add ANA base support Hannes Reinecke
2018-05-06 2:42 ` Guan Junxiong
2018-05-04 11:28 ` [PATCH 4/5] block: BLK_STS_NEXUS is a path failure Hannes Reinecke
2018-05-09 7:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-04 11:28 ` [PATCH 5/5] nvme: ANA base support Hannes Reinecke
2018-05-04 22:11 ` Schremmer, Steven
2018-05-05 13:23 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-05-06 3:23 ` Guan Junxiong
2018-05-07 7:21 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-05-09 18:49 ` Ewan D. Milne
2018-05-09 19:03 ` Ewan D. Milne
2018-05-10 9:16 ` Sriram Popuri
[not found] ` <CAGYjvj0Mk0MFAfUEApOOyQ9Prm3CvGcZH14PJzDQT2+Qc+w81w@mail.gmail.com>
2018-05-10 13:40 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-05-11 7:50 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-05-11 8:22 ` Popuri, Sriram
2018-05-11 8:36 ` Popuri, Sriram
2018-05-11 16:24 ` Knight, Frederick
2018-05-12 13:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-13 10:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180509075253.GA21148@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).