From: ming.lei@redhat.com (Ming Lei)
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] nvme: pci: simplify timeout handling
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 05:50:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180510215006.GD3515@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180510214441.GD4787@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, May 10, 2018@03:44:41PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2018@05:24:46AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Could you share me the link?
>
> The diff was in this reply here:
>
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/2018-April/017019.html
>
> > Firstly, the previous nvme_sync_queues() won't work reliably, so this
> > patch introduces blk_unquiesce_timeout() and blk_quiesce_timeout() for
> > this purpose.
> >
> > Secondly, I remembered that you only call nvme_sync_queues() at the
> > entry of nvme_reset_work(), but timeout(either admin or normal IO)
> > can happen again during resetting, that is another race addressed by
> > this patchset, but can't cover by your proposal.
>
> I sync the queues at the beginning because it ensures there is not
> a single in flight request for the entire controller (all namespaces
> plus admin queue) before transitioning to the connecting state.
But it can't avoid the race I mentioned, since nvme_dev_disable() can
happen again during resetting.
>
> If a command times out during connecting state, we go to the dead state.
That is too risky, since the IO during resetting isn't much different
with IOs submitted from other IO paths.
For example, in case of blktests block/011, controller shouldn't have
been put into dead, and this patchset(V4 & V5) can cover this case well.
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-10 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-26 12:39 [PATCH 0/2] nvme: pci: fix & improve timeout handling Ming Lei
2018-04-26 12:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] nvme: pci: simplify " Ming Lei
2018-04-26 15:07 ` jianchao.wang
2018-04-26 15:57 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-26 16:16 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-27 1:37 ` jianchao.wang
2018-04-27 14:57 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-28 14:00 ` jianchao.wang
2018-04-28 21:57 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-28 22:27 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-29 1:36 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-29 2:21 ` jianchao.wang
2018-04-29 14:13 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-27 17:51 ` Keith Busch
2018-04-28 3:50 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-28 13:35 ` Keith Busch
2018-04-28 14:31 ` jianchao.wang
2018-04-28 21:39 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-30 19:52 ` Keith Busch
2018-04-30 23:14 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-08 15:30 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-10 20:52 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-10 21:05 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-10 21:10 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-10 21:18 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-10 21:24 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-10 21:44 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-10 21:50 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2018-05-10 21:53 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-10 22:03 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-10 22:43 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-11 0:14 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-11 2:10 ` Ming Lei
2018-04-26 12:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme: pci: guarantee EH can make progress Ming Lei
2018-04-26 16:24 ` Keith Busch
2018-04-28 3:28 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180510215006.GD3515@ming.t460p \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).