From: keith.busch@linux.intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] nvme: remove ->cq_vector == -1 check in nvme_queue_rq()
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 09:32:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180517153204.GA23555@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1526569337-3489-2-git-send-email-axboe@kernel.dk>
On Thu, May 17, 2018@09:02:15AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> We only clear this after calling nvme_suspend_queue(), which must
> have called nvme_stop_queues() first. The latter ensures that no
> more IO is queued, or in progress of being queued, against this
> hardware queue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/pci.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> index 5277afc6e7b5..4ed3583ad3bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> @@ -887,11 +887,6 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> blk_mq_start_request(req);
>
> spin_lock_irq(&nvmeq->q_lock);
> - if (unlikely(nvmeq->cq_vector < 0)) {
> - ret = BLK_STS_IOERR;
> - spin_unlock_irq(&nvmeq->q_lock);
> - goto out_cleanup_iod;
> - }
> __nvme_submit_cmd(nvmeq, &cmnd);
> spin_unlock_irq(&nvmeq->q_lock);
> return BLK_STS_OK;
Unfortunatley we are still relying on this to drain entered requests on
a dying queue: we restart them to flush to out requests to complete with
error. :(
There's probably a better way to handle this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-17 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-17 15:02 [PATCHSET 0/3] Split queue lock into submission/completion locks Jens Axboe
2018-05-17 15:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] nvme: remove ->cq_vector == -1 check in nvme_queue_rq() Jens Axboe
2018-05-17 15:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-17 15:32 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-05-17 15:36 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-17 15:42 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-17 15:52 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-17 15:52 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-17 16:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-17 15:44 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-17 15:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] nvme: split the nvme queue lock into submission and completion locks Jens Axboe
2018-05-17 15:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-17 15:33 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-17 15:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] nvme: drop IRQ disabling on submission queue lock Jens Axboe
2018-05-17 15:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-17 15:22 ` [PATCHSET 0/3] Split queue lock into submission/completion locks Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180517153204.GA23555@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).