From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] nvme-pci: split the nvme queue lock into submission and completion locks
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 18:31:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180517163152.23155-7-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180517163152.23155-1-hch@lst.de>
This is now feasible. We protect the submission queue ring with
->sq_lock, and the completion side with ->cq_lock.
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst.de>
---
drivers/nvme/host/pci.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
index 246882bdef54..49c783801fd4 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
@@ -147,9 +147,10 @@ static inline struct nvme_dev *to_nvme_dev(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
struct nvme_queue {
struct device *q_dmadev;
struct nvme_dev *dev;
- spinlock_t q_lock;
+ spinlock_t sq_lock;
struct nvme_command *sq_cmds;
struct nvme_command __iomem *sq_cmds_io;
+ spinlock_t cq_lock ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
volatile struct nvme_completion *cqes;
struct blk_mq_tags **tags;
dma_addr_t sq_dma_addr;
@@ -894,9 +895,9 @@ static blk_status_t nvme_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
blk_mq_start_request(req);
- spin_lock_irq(&nvmeq->q_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&nvmeq->sq_lock);
__nvme_submit_cmd(nvmeq, &cmnd);
- spin_unlock_irq(&nvmeq->q_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&nvmeq->sq_lock);
return BLK_STS_OK;
out_cleanup_iod:
nvme_free_iod(dev, req);
@@ -1000,9 +1001,9 @@ static irqreturn_t nvme_irq(int irq, void *data)
struct nvme_queue *nvmeq = data;
u16 start, end;
- spin_lock(&nvmeq->q_lock);
+ spin_lock(&nvmeq->cq_lock);
nvme_process_cq(nvmeq, &start, &end, -1);
- spin_unlock(&nvmeq->q_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&nvmeq->cq_lock);
if (start == end)
return IRQ_NONE;
@@ -1026,9 +1027,9 @@ static int __nvme_poll(struct nvme_queue *nvmeq, unsigned int tag)
if (!nvme_cqe_pending(nvmeq))
return 0;
- spin_lock_irq(&nvmeq->q_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&nvmeq->cq_lock);
found = nvme_process_cq(nvmeq, &start, &end, tag);
- spin_unlock_irq(&nvmeq->q_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&nvmeq->cq_lock);
nvme_complete_cqes(nvmeq, start, end);
return found;
@@ -1051,9 +1052,9 @@ static void nvme_pci_submit_async_event(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
c.common.opcode = nvme_admin_async_event;
c.common.command_id = NVME_AQ_BLK_MQ_DEPTH;
- spin_lock_irq(&nvmeq->q_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&nvmeq->sq_lock);
__nvme_submit_cmd(nvmeq, &c);
- spin_unlock_irq(&nvmeq->q_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&nvmeq->sq_lock);
}
static int adapter_delete_queue(struct nvme_dev *dev, u8 opcode, u16 id)
@@ -1310,15 +1311,15 @@ static int nvme_suspend_queue(struct nvme_queue *nvmeq)
{
int vector;
- spin_lock_irq(&nvmeq->q_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&nvmeq->cq_lock);
if (nvmeq->cq_vector == -1) {
- spin_unlock_irq(&nvmeq->q_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&nvmeq->cq_lock);
return 1;
}
vector = nvmeq->cq_vector;
nvmeq->dev->online_queues--;
nvmeq->cq_vector = -1;
- spin_unlock_irq(&nvmeq->q_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&nvmeq->cq_lock);
/*
* Ensure that nvme_queue_rq() sees it ->cq_vector == -1 without
@@ -1344,9 +1345,9 @@ static void nvme_disable_admin_queue(struct nvme_dev *dev, bool shutdown)
else
nvme_disable_ctrl(&dev->ctrl, dev->ctrl.cap);
- spin_lock_irq(&nvmeq->q_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&nvmeq->cq_lock);
nvme_process_cq(nvmeq, &start, &end, -1);
- spin_unlock_irq(&nvmeq->q_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&nvmeq->cq_lock);
nvme_complete_cqes(nvmeq, start, end);
}
@@ -1406,7 +1407,8 @@ static int nvme_alloc_queue(struct nvme_dev *dev, int qid, int depth)
nvmeq->q_dmadev = dev->dev;
nvmeq->dev = dev;
- spin_lock_init(&nvmeq->q_lock);
+ spin_lock_init(&nvmeq->sq_lock);
+ spin_lock_init(&nvmeq->cq_lock);
nvmeq->cq_head = 0;
nvmeq->cq_phase = 1;
nvmeq->q_db = &dev->dbs[qid * 2 * dev->db_stride];
@@ -1442,7 +1444,7 @@ static void nvme_init_queue(struct nvme_queue *nvmeq, u16 qid)
{
struct nvme_dev *dev = nvmeq->dev;
- spin_lock_irq(&nvmeq->q_lock);
+ spin_lock_irq(&nvmeq->cq_lock);
nvmeq->sq_tail = 0;
nvmeq->cq_head = 0;
nvmeq->cq_phase = 1;
@@ -1450,7 +1452,7 @@ static void nvme_init_queue(struct nvme_queue *nvmeq, u16 qid)
memset((void *)nvmeq->cqes, 0, CQ_SIZE(nvmeq->q_depth));
nvme_dbbuf_init(dev, nvmeq, qid);
dev->online_queues++;
- spin_unlock_irq(&nvmeq->q_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&nvmeq->cq_lock);
}
static int nvme_create_queue(struct nvme_queue *nvmeq, int qid)
@@ -2001,14 +2003,14 @@ static void nvme_del_cq_end(struct request *req, blk_status_t error)
unsigned long flags;
/*
- * We might be called with the AQ q_lock held
- * and the I/O queue q_lock should always
+ * We might be called with the AQ cq_lock held
+ * and the I/O queue cq_lock should always
* nest inside the AQ one.
*/
- spin_lock_irqsave_nested(&nvmeq->q_lock, flags,
+ spin_lock_irqsave_nested(&nvmeq->cq_lock, flags,
SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
nvme_process_cq(nvmeq, &start, &end, -1);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&nvmeq->q_lock, flags);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&nvmeq->cq_lock, flags);
nvme_complete_cqes(nvmeq, start, end);
}
--
2.17.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-17 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-17 16:31 RFC: handle completions outside the queue lock and split the queue lock Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-17 16:31 ` [PATCH 1/7] nvme: mark the result argument to nvme_complete_async_event volatile Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-17 16:31 ` [PATCH 2/7] nvme-pci: simplify nvme_cqe_valid Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-17 16:31 ` [PATCH 3/7] nvme-pci: remove cq check after submission Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-17 16:31 ` [PATCH 4/7] nvme-pci: move ->cq_vector == -1 check outside of ->q_lock Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-17 16:31 ` [PATCH 5/7] nvme-pci: handle completions outside of the queue lock Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-17 16:31 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-05-17 16:31 ` [PATCH 7/7] nvme-pci: drop IRQ disabling on submission " Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-17 16:36 ` RFC: handle completions outside the queue lock and split the " Jens Axboe
2018-05-17 16:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-17 16:55 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-17 17:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-17 17:05 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-17 17:08 ` Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-05-18 14:52 [PATCHSET v2 0/7] Improve nvme completion handling Jens Axboe
2018-05-18 14:52 ` [PATCH 6/7] nvme-pci: split the nvme queue lock into submission and completion locks Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180517163152.23155-7-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).