linux-nvme.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: keith.busch@linux.intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] nvme-pci: handle completions outside of the queue lock
Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 15:25:03 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180518212503.GA31490@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <93585ba6-32a3-d8aa-ad5c-ee22be3e8e8e@kernel.dk>

On Fri, May 18, 2018@03:11:21PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Gah, I didn't manage to trigger any of that. What was your test case?
> I'll see if I can come up with a nice cqe_seen replacement.

Runing the following profile on the is lowest latency drive I have in my
"big" server (112 CPUs, type Xeon Platinum 8180), in pure polling
(io_poll_delay is -1), sustaining 190k IOPs:

[global]
ioengine=pvsync2
cpus_allowed=29
direct=1
rw=randread
norandommap
bs=4k
hipri
ramp_time=1
runtime=10
gtod_reduce=1
clocksource=cpu

[test]
filename=/dev/nvme1n1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-18 21:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-18 14:52 [PATCHSET v2 0/7] Improve nvme completion handling Jens Axboe
2018-05-18 14:52 ` [PATCH 1/7] nvme: mark the result argument to nvme_complete_async_event volatile Jens Axboe
2018-05-18 14:52 ` [PATCH 2/7] nvme-pci: simplify nvme_cqe_valid Jens Axboe
2018-05-18 20:49   ` Keith Busch
2018-05-18 20:48     ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-18 14:52 ` [PATCH 3/7] nvme-pci: remove cq check after submission Jens Axboe
2018-05-18 14:52 ` [PATCH 4/7] nvme-pci: move ->cq_vector == -1 check outside of ->q_lock Jens Axboe
2018-05-18 14:52 ` [PATCH 5/7] nvme-pci: handle completions outside of the queue lock Jens Axboe
2018-05-18 21:06   ` Keith Busch
2018-05-18 21:11     ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-18 21:22       ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-18 21:28         ` Keith Busch
2018-05-18 21:31           ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-18 21:48             ` Keith Busch
2018-05-18 22:46               ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-21 14:18               ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-21 14:23                 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-21 14:33                   ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-21 14:40                     ` Keith Busch
2018-05-21 14:43                       ` Keith Busch
2018-05-18 21:25       ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-05-18 14:52 ` [PATCH 6/7] nvme-pci: split the nvme queue lock into submission and completion locks Jens Axboe
2018-05-18 14:52 ` [PATCH 7/7] nvme-pci: drop IRQ disabling on submission queue lock Jens Axboe
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-05-17 16:31 RFC: handle completions outside the queue lock and split the " Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-17 16:31 ` [PATCH 5/7] nvme-pci: handle completions outside of " Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180518212503.GA31490@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=keith.busch@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).