From: keith.busch@linux.intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/3] blk-mq: Timeout rework
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 10:44:04 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180522164403.GB8388@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56564c0694eb3a21dfdcfbc6c3053774f026d371.camel@wdc.com>
On Tue, May 22, 2018@04:30:41PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>
> Please have a look at v13 of the timeout handling rework patch that I posted.
> That patch should not introduce any new race conditions and should also handle
> the scenario fine in which blk_mq_complete_request() is called while the NVMe
> timeout handling function is in progress.
Thanks for the notice. That sounds very interesting and will be happy
take a look.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-22 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-21 23:11 [RFC PATCH 0/3] blk-mq: Timeout rework Keith Busch
2018-05-21 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] blk-mq: Reference count request usage Keith Busch
2018-05-22 2:27 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-22 15:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-21 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] blk-mq: Fix timeout and state order Keith Busch
2018-05-22 2:28 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-22 15:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-22 16:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-21 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: Remove generation seqeunce Keith Busch
2018-05-21 23:29 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-22 14:15 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-22 16:29 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-22 16:34 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-22 16:48 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-22 2:49 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-22 3:16 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-22 3:47 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-22 3:51 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-22 8:51 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-22 14:35 ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-22 14:20 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-22 14:37 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-22 14:46 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-22 14:57 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-22 15:01 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-22 15:07 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-22 15:17 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-22 15:23 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-22 16:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-23 0:34 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-23 14:35 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-24 1:52 ` Ming Lei
2018-05-23 5:48 ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-07-12 18:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-12 19:24 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-12 22:24 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-13 1:12 ` jianchao.wang
2018-07-13 2:40 ` jianchao.wang
2018-07-13 15:43 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-13 15:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-13 18:47 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-13 23:03 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-13 23:58 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-18 19:56 ` hch
2018-07-18 20:39 ` hch
2018-07-18 21:05 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-18 22:53 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-18 20:53 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-18 20:58 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-18 21:17 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-18 21:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-18 21:33 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-19 13:19 ` hch
2018-07-19 14:59 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-19 15:56 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-19 16:04 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-19 16:22 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-19 16:29 ` hch
2018-07-19 20:18 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-19 13:22 ` hch
2018-05-21 23:29 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] blk-mq: Timeout rework Bart Van Assche
2018-05-22 14:06 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-22 16:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-22 16:44 ` Keith Busch [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180522164403.GB8388@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).