linux-nvme.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: keith.busch@linux.intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: Remove generation seqeunce
Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 08:35:40 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180523143539.GA10882@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180523003446.GC31196@ming.t460p>

On Wed, May 23, 2018@08:34:48AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Let's consider the normal NVMe timeout code path:
> 
> 1) one request is timed out;
> 
> 2) controller is shutdown, this timed-out request is requeued from
> nvme_cancel_request(), but can't dispatch because queues are quiesced
> 
> 3) reset is done from another context, and this request is dispatched
> again, and completed exactly before returning EH_HANDLED to blk-mq, but
> its state isn't updated to COMPLETE yet.
> 
> 4) then double completions are done from both normal completion and timeout
> path.

We're definitely fixing this, but I must admit that's an impressive
cognitive traversal across 5 thread contexts to arrive at that race. :)

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-23 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-21 23:11 [RFC PATCH 0/3] blk-mq: Timeout rework Keith Busch
2018-05-21 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] blk-mq: Reference count request usage Keith Busch
2018-05-22  2:27   ` Ming Lei
2018-05-22 15:19   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-21 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] blk-mq: Fix timeout and state order Keith Busch
2018-05-22  2:28   ` Ming Lei
2018-05-22 15:24   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-22 16:27     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-21 23:11 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: Remove generation seqeunce Keith Busch
2018-05-21 23:29   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-22 14:15     ` Keith Busch
2018-05-22 16:29       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-22 16:34         ` Keith Busch
2018-05-22 16:48           ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-22  2:49   ` Ming Lei
2018-05-22  3:16     ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-22  3:47       ` Ming Lei
2018-05-22  3:51         ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-22  8:51           ` Ming Lei
2018-05-22 14:35             ` Jens Axboe
2018-05-22 14:20     ` Keith Busch
2018-05-22 14:37       ` Ming Lei
2018-05-22 14:46         ` Keith Busch
2018-05-22 14:57           ` Ming Lei
2018-05-22 15:01             ` Keith Busch
2018-05-22 15:07               ` Ming Lei
2018-05-22 15:17                 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-22 15:23                   ` Ming Lei
2018-05-22 16:17   ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-23  0:34     ` Ming Lei
2018-05-23 14:35       ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-05-24  1:52         ` Ming Lei
2018-05-23  5:48     ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-07-12 18:16   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-12 19:24     ` Keith Busch
2018-07-12 22:24       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-13  1:12         ` jianchao.wang
2018-07-13  2:40         ` jianchao.wang
2018-07-13 15:43         ` Keith Busch
2018-07-13 15:52           ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-13 18:47             ` Keith Busch
2018-07-13 23:03               ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-13 23:58                 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-18 19:56                   ` hch
2018-07-18 20:39                     ` hch
2018-07-18 21:05                       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-18 22:53                       ` Keith Busch
2018-07-18 20:53                     ` Keith Busch
2018-07-18 20:58                       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-18 21:17                         ` Keith Busch
2018-07-18 21:30                           ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-18 21:33                             ` Keith Busch
2018-07-19 13:19                           ` hch
2018-07-19 14:59                             ` Keith Busch
2018-07-19 15:56                               ` Keith Busch
2018-07-19 16:04                                 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-07-19 16:22                                   ` Keith Busch
2018-07-19 16:29                                     ` hch
2018-07-19 20:18                                       ` Keith Busch
2018-07-19 13:22                       ` hch
2018-05-21 23:29 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] blk-mq: Timeout rework Bart Van Assche
2018-05-22 14:06   ` Keith Busch
2018-05-22 16:30     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-05-22 16:44       ` Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180523143539.GA10882@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=keith.busch@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).