From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)
Subject: [PATCHv3 5/9] nvme-pci: End IO requests in CONNECTING state
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 22:47:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180524204722.GB29048@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180524203500.14081-6-keith.busch@intel.com>
On Thu, May 24, 2018@02:34:56PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> IO is always quiesced in the CONNECTING state, so any any timeout for an
> IO command had already been completed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/pci.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> index 6be88f662e7d..54e22b964385 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> @@ -1227,6 +1227,14 @@ static enum blk_eh_timer_return nvme_timeout(struct request *req, bool reserved)
> */
> switch (dev->ctrl.state) {
> case NVME_CTRL_CONNECTING:
> + /*
> + * IO is never dispatched from the connecting state. If an IO
> + * queue timed out here, the block layer missed the completion
> + * the driver already requested, so return handled.
> + */
> + if (nvmeq->qid)
> + return BLK_EH_HANDLED;
How can we hit this case? This just looks a lot like papering
over the real issue..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-24 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-24 20:34 [PATCHv3 0/9] nvme timeout fixes, v3 Keith Busch
2018-05-24 20:34 ` [PATCHv3 1/9] nvme: Sync request queues on reset Keith Busch
2018-05-25 12:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-25 14:22 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-25 14:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-25 14:45 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-25 15:56 ` James Smart
2018-05-25 16:24 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-25 18:04 ` James Smart
2018-05-25 18:30 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-30 23:25 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-06-05 16:25 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-30 23:24 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-05-24 20:34 ` [PATCHv3 2/9] nvme-pci: Fix queue freeze criteria " Keith Busch
2018-05-25 12:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-30 23:36 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-05-24 20:34 ` [PATCHv3 3/9] nvme: Move all IO out of controller reset Keith Busch
2018-05-25 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-25 14:41 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-24 20:34 ` [PATCHv3 4/9] nvme-pci: Rate limit the nvme timeout warnings Keith Busch
2018-05-25 13:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-30 6:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-24 20:34 ` [PATCHv3 5/9] nvme-pci: End IO requests in CONNECTING state Keith Busch
2018-05-24 20:47 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-05-24 21:03 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-25 12:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-24 20:34 ` [PATCHv3 6/9] nvme-pci: Unquiesce dead controller queues Keith Busch
2018-05-25 13:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-24 20:34 ` [PATCHv3 7/9] nvme-pci: Attempt reset retry for IO failures Keith Busch
2018-05-25 13:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-25 14:25 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-30 23:40 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-06-04 22:46 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-24 20:34 ` [PATCHv3 8/9] nvme-pci: Queue creation error handling Keith Busch
2018-05-25 12:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-05 16:28 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-30 23:37 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-05-24 20:35 ` [PATCHv3 9/9] nvme-pci: Don't wait for HMB completion on shutdown Keith Busch
2018-05-24 20:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-24 21:15 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-25 3:10 ` jianchao.wang
2018-05-25 15:09 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-25 12:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-13 0:48 ` [PATCHv3 0/9] nvme timeout fixes, v3 Ming Lei
2018-07-13 20:54 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180524204722.GB29048@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).