From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)
Subject: [PATCHv3 1/9] nvme: Sync request queues on reset
Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 14:42:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180525124209.GD23463@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180524203500.14081-2-keith.busch@intel.com>
On Thu, May 24, 2018@02:34:52PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> This patch fixes races that occur with simultaneous controller
> resets
Wait.. How do we end up with simultaneous controller resets? We
not only have the NVME_CTRL_RESETTING resetting state, but also
execute all resets from ctrl->reset_work, so they are implicitly
single threaded.
> by synchronizing request queues prior to initializing the
> controller. Without this, a timeout thread may attempt disabling a
> controller at the same time as we're trying to enable it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h | 1 +
> drivers/nvme/host/pci.c | 11 +++++++----
> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index dc8aa2c1c22a..33034e469bbc 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -3469,6 +3469,12 @@ int nvme_init_ctrl(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, struct device *dev,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_init_ctrl);
>
> +static void nvme_start_queue(struct nvme_ns *ns)
> +{
> + blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(ns->queue);
> + blk_mq_kick_requeue_list(ns->queue);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * nvme_kill_queues(): Ends all namespace queues
> * @ctrl: the dead controller that needs to end
> @@ -3497,7 +3503,7 @@ void nvme_kill_queues(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
> blk_set_queue_dying(ns->queue);
>
> /* Forcibly unquiesce queues to avoid blocking dispatch */
> - blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(ns->queue);
> + nvme_start_queue(ns);
> }
> up_read(&ctrl->namespaces_rwsem);
> }
> @@ -3567,11 +3573,22 @@ void nvme_start_queues(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
>
> down_read(&ctrl->namespaces_rwsem);
> list_for_each_entry(ns, &ctrl->namespaces, list)
> - blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(ns->queue);
> + nvme_start_queue(ns);
> up_read(&ctrl->namespaces_rwsem);
The whole kick the requeue list when starting queues bit seems like
it should be a separate patch.
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_start_queues);
>
> +void nvme_sync_queues(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
> +{
> + struct nvme_ns *ns;
> +
> + down_read(&ctrl->namespaces_rwsem);
> + list_for_each_entry(ns, &ctrl->namespaces, list)
> + blk_sync_queue(ns->queue);
> + up_read(&ctrl->namespaces_rwsem);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_sync_queues);
> +
> int nvme_reinit_tagset(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, struct blk_mq_tag_set *set)
> {
> if (!ctrl->ops->reinit_request)
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
> index ec6e4acc4d48..4f43918cd902 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
> @@ -403,6 +403,7 @@ int nvme_sec_submit(void *data, u16 spsp, u8 secp, void *buffer, size_t len,
> void nvme_complete_async_event(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, __le16 status,
> volatile union nvme_result *res);
>
> +void nvme_sync_queues(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl);
> void nvme_stop_queues(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl);
> void nvme_start_queues(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl);
> void nvme_kill_queues(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl);
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> index 917e1714f7d9..9da28e10d942 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> @@ -2317,11 +2317,14 @@ static void nvme_reset_work(struct work_struct *work)
> goto out;
>
> /*
> - * If we're called to reset a live controller first shut it down before
> - * moving on.
> + * Ensure there are no timeout work in progress prior to forcefully
> + * disabling the queue. There is no harm in disabling the device even
> + * when it was already disabled, as this will forcefully reclaim any
> + * IOs that are stuck due to blk-mq's timeout handling that prevents
> + * timed out requests from completing.
> */
> - if (dev->ctrl.ctrl_config & NVME_CC_ENABLE)
> - nvme_dev_disable(dev, false);
> + nvme_sync_queues(&dev->ctrl);
> + nvme_dev_disable(dev, false);
And this part also makes sense to me, but I don't really understand
how it relates to the commit message.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-25 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-24 20:34 [PATCHv3 0/9] nvme timeout fixes, v3 Keith Busch
2018-05-24 20:34 ` [PATCHv3 1/9] nvme: Sync request queues on reset Keith Busch
2018-05-25 12:42 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-05-25 14:22 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-25 14:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-25 14:45 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-25 15:56 ` James Smart
2018-05-25 16:24 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-25 18:04 ` James Smart
2018-05-25 18:30 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-30 23:25 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-06-05 16:25 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-30 23:24 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-05-24 20:34 ` [PATCHv3 2/9] nvme-pci: Fix queue freeze criteria " Keith Busch
2018-05-25 12:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-30 23:36 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-05-24 20:34 ` [PATCHv3 3/9] nvme: Move all IO out of controller reset Keith Busch
2018-05-25 13:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-25 14:41 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-24 20:34 ` [PATCHv3 4/9] nvme-pci: Rate limit the nvme timeout warnings Keith Busch
2018-05-25 13:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-30 6:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-24 20:34 ` [PATCHv3 5/9] nvme-pci: End IO requests in CONNECTING state Keith Busch
2018-05-24 20:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-24 21:03 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-25 12:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-24 20:34 ` [PATCHv3 6/9] nvme-pci: Unquiesce dead controller queues Keith Busch
2018-05-25 13:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-24 20:34 ` [PATCHv3 7/9] nvme-pci: Attempt reset retry for IO failures Keith Busch
2018-05-25 13:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-25 14:25 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-30 23:40 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-06-04 22:46 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-24 20:34 ` [PATCHv3 8/9] nvme-pci: Queue creation error handling Keith Busch
2018-05-25 12:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-05 16:28 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-30 23:37 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-05-24 20:35 ` [PATCHv3 9/9] nvme-pci: Don't wait for HMB completion on shutdown Keith Busch
2018-05-24 20:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-05-24 21:15 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-25 3:10 ` jianchao.wang
2018-05-25 15:09 ` Keith Busch
2018-05-25 12:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-13 0:48 ` [PATCHv3 0/9] nvme timeout fixes, v3 Ming Lei
2018-07-13 20:54 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180525124209.GD23463@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).