Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] nvme-fabrics: refactor queue ready check
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 14:19:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180614121915.GA27209@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f3264852-771e-864c-a57d-cb33a55ca768@broadcom.com>

On Wed, Jun 13, 2018@08:54:25AM -0700, James Smart wrote:
> When I finally finished with the review on your last patch:
> [PATCH 4/4] nvme-fabrics: reverse polarity in __nvmf_check_ready
>
> I think you had addressed this issue so the patch below isn't necessary.

Even with patch 4 we'd still allow kernel-generated connect commands
in non-new, non-connecting states.  We should not generally send them,
so I think the series as-is should be ok, but if touch all this code
we might as well handle that case as well.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-14 12:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-11 15:46 queue ready fixes and cleanups Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-11 15:46 ` [PATCH 1/4] nvme-fabrics: refactor queue ready check Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-12  8:23   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-06-12 21:45   ` James Smart
2018-06-13  8:16     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-13 15:54       ` James Smart
2018-06-14 12:19         ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2018-06-13 19:48   ` James Smart
2018-06-11 15:46 ` [PATCH 2/4] nvme-fabrics: handle queue ready fast path inline Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-12  8:24   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-06-12 21:47   ` James Smart
2018-06-11 15:46 ` [PATCH 3/4] nvme-fabrics: handle the admin-only case properly in nvmf_check_ready Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-12  8:25   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-06-12 21:48   ` James Smart
2018-06-13  7:59     ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-11 15:46 ` [PATCH 4/4] nvme-fabrics: reverse polarity in __nvmf_check_ready Christoph Hellwig
2018-06-12  8:26   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2018-06-12 11:08   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-06-12 22:22     ` James Smart
2018-06-12 22:05   ` James Smart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180614121915.GA27209@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox