linux-nvme.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v3 for-4.18 2/2] nvmet: check fileio lba range access boundaries
@ 2018-07-11 13:13 Sagi Grimberg
  2018-07-12  3:05 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
  2018-07-12  7:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sagi Grimberg @ 2018-07-11 13:13 UTC (permalink / raw)


Fail out-of-bounds with a proper status code.

Fixes: d5eff33ee6f8 ("nvmet: add simple file backed ns support")
Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi at grimberg.me>
---
Changes from v2:
- rebase accident - use offset + len after assigning them

Changes from v1:
- move boundary check before resource allocation so we don't need
to worry about freeing them (nvmet_file_execute_rw).

 drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-file.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-file.c b/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-file.c
index dad8d44bf90e..c2d0d08b59c8 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-file.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-file.c
@@ -145,6 +145,12 @@ static void nvmet_file_execute_rw(struct nvmet_req *req)
 		return;
 	}
 
+	pos = le64_to_cpu(req->cmd->rw.slba) << req->ns->blksize_shift;
+	if (unlikely(pos + req->data_len > req->ns->size)) {
+		nvmet_req_complete(req, NVME_SC_LBA_RANGE | NVME_SC_DNR);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	if (nr_bvec > NVMET_MAX_INLINE_BIOVEC)
 		req->f.bvec = kmalloc_array(nr_bvec, sizeof(struct bio_vec),
 				GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -160,8 +166,6 @@ static void nvmet_file_execute_rw(struct nvmet_req *req)
 			is_sync = true;
 	}
 
-	pos = le64_to_cpu(req->cmd->rw.slba) << req->ns->blksize_shift;
-
 	memset(&req->f.iocb, 0, sizeof(struct kiocb));
 	for_each_sg_page(req->sg, &sg_pg_iter, req->sg_cnt, 0) {
 		nvmet_file_init_bvec(&req->f.bvec[bv_cnt], &sg_pg_iter);
@@ -236,8 +240,14 @@ static void nvmet_file_execute_discard(struct nvmet_req *req)
 					sizeof(range));
 		if (ret)
 			break;
+
 		offset = le64_to_cpu(range.slba) << req->ns->blksize_shift;
 		len = le32_to_cpu(range.nlb) << req->ns->blksize_shift;
+		if (offset + len > req->ns->size) {
+			ret = NVME_SC_LBA_RANGE | NVME_SC_DNR;
+			break;
+		}
+
 		if (vfs_fallocate(req->ns->file, mode, offset, len)) {
 			ret = NVME_SC_INTERNAL | NVME_SC_DNR;
 			break;
@@ -283,6 +293,11 @@ static void nvmet_file_write_zeroes_work(struct work_struct *w)
 	len = (((sector_t)le16_to_cpu(write_zeroes->length) + 1) <<
 			req->ns->blksize_shift);
 
+	if (unlikely(offset + len > req->ns->size)) {
+		nvmet_req_complete(req, NVME_SC_LBA_RANGE | NVME_SC_DNR);
+		return;
+	}
+
 	ret = vfs_fallocate(req->ns->file, mode, offset, len);
 	nvmet_req_complete(req, ret < 0 ? NVME_SC_INTERNAL | NVME_SC_DNR : 0);
 }
-- 
2.14.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 for-4.18 2/2] nvmet: check fileio lba range access boundaries
  2018-07-11 13:13 [PATCH v3 for-4.18 2/2] nvmet: check fileio lba range access boundaries Sagi Grimberg
@ 2018-07-12  3:05 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
  2018-07-12  7:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chaitanya Kulkarni @ 2018-07-12  3:05 UTC (permalink / raw)


Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni at wdc.com>


From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2018 6:13 AM
To: linux-nvme at lists.infradead.org
Cc: Christoph Hellwig; Chaitanya Kulkarni
Subject: [PATCH v3 for-4.18 2/2] nvmet: check fileio lba range access boundaries
? 
 
Fail out-of-bounds with a proper status code.

Fixes: d5eff33ee6f8 ("nvmet: add simple file backed ns support")
Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi at grimberg.me>
---
Changes from v2:
- rebase accident - use offset + len after assigning them

Changes from v1:
- move boundary check before resource allocation so we don't need
to worry about freeing them (nvmet_file_execute_rw).

?drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-file.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
?1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-file.c b/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-file.c
index dad8d44bf90e..c2d0d08b59c8 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-file.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd-file.c
@@ -145,6 +145,12 @@ static void nvmet_file_execute_rw(struct nvmet_req *req)
???????????????? return;
???????? }
?
+?????? pos = le64_to_cpu(req->cmd->rw.slba) << req->ns->blksize_shift;
+?????? if (unlikely(pos + req->data_len > req->ns->size)) {
+?????????????? nvmet_req_complete(req, NVME_SC_LBA_RANGE | NVME_SC_DNR);
+?????????????? return;
+?????? }
+
???????? if (nr_bvec > NVMET_MAX_INLINE_BIOVEC)
???????????????? req->f.bvec = kmalloc_array(nr_bvec, sizeof(struct bio_vec),
???????????????????????????????? GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -160,8 +166,6 @@ static void nvmet_file_execute_rw(struct nvmet_req *req)
???????????????????????? is_sync = true;
???????? }
?
-?????? pos = le64_to_cpu(req->cmd->rw.slba) << req->ns->blksize_shift;
-
???????? memset(&req->f.iocb, 0, sizeof(struct kiocb));
???????? for_each_sg_page(req->sg, &sg_pg_iter, req->sg_cnt, 0) {
???????????????? nvmet_file_init_bvec(&req->f.bvec[bv_cnt], &sg_pg_iter);
@@ -236,8 +240,14 @@ static void nvmet_file_execute_discard(struct nvmet_req *req)
???????????????????????????????????????? sizeof(range));
???????????????? if (ret)
???????????????????????? break;
+
???????????????? offset = le64_to_cpu(range.slba) << req->ns->blksize_shift;
???????????????? len = le32_to_cpu(range.nlb) << req->ns->blksize_shift;
+?????????????? if (offset + len > req->ns->size) {
+?????????????????????? ret = NVME_SC_LBA_RANGE | NVME_SC_DNR;
+?????????????????????? break;
+?????????????? }
+
???????????????? if (vfs_fallocate(req->ns->file, mode, offset, len)) {
???????????????????????? ret = NVME_SC_INTERNAL | NVME_SC_DNR;
???????????????????????? break;
@@ -283,6 +293,11 @@ static void nvmet_file_write_zeroes_work(struct work_struct *w)
???????? len = (((sector_t)le16_to_cpu(write_zeroes->length) + 1) <<
???????????????????????? req->ns->blksize_shift);
?
+?????? if (unlikely(offset + len > req->ns->size)) {
+?????????????? nvmet_req_complete(req, NVME_SC_LBA_RANGE | NVME_SC_DNR);
+?????????????? return;
+?????? }
+
???????? ret = vfs_fallocate(req->ns->file, mode, offset, len);
???????? nvmet_req_complete(req, ret < 0 ? NVME_SC_INTERNAL | NVME_SC_DNR : 0);
?}
-- 
2.14.1

    

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v3 for-4.18 2/2] nvmet: check fileio lba range access boundaries
  2018-07-11 13:13 [PATCH v3 for-4.18 2/2] nvmet: check fileio lba range access boundaries Sagi Grimberg
  2018-07-12  3:05 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
@ 2018-07-12  7:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2018-07-12  7:25 UTC (permalink / raw)


Thanks, applied.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-07-12  7:25 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-07-11 13:13 [PATCH v3 for-4.18 2/2] nvmet: check fileio lba range access boundaries Sagi Grimberg
2018-07-12  3:05 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2018-07-12  7:25 ` Christoph Hellwig

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).