Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: keith.busch@linux.intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [PATCHv4 1/4] nvme: Sync request queues on reset
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 07:30:59 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180716133059.GB19967@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180716103956.GB25386@ming.t460p>

On Mon, Jul 16, 2018@06:39:57PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018@04:52:39PM +0800, jianchao.wang wrote:
> > Hi Keith
> > 
> > On 07/14/2018 04:56 AM, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > This patch fixes races that occur with simultaneous controller
> > > resets by synchronizing request queues prior to initializing the
> > > controller. Withouth this, a thread may attempt disabling a controller
> > > at the same time as we're trying to enable it.
> > 
> > This issue is due to the previous blk-mq timeout mechanism will hold
> > all the timed out requests, then nvme_dev_disable cannot grab these requests
> > and when it returns, the blk_mq_timeout_work could be still running.
> > But after commit 12f5b9314545 ("blk-mq: Remove generation seqeunce"),
> > nvme_dev_disble have been able to grab all the requests and when it returns,
> > there will be no any requests in blk_mq_timeout_work so nvme_dev_disable will
> > not be invoked multiple times.
> > So this patch should be unnecessary. :)
> 
> There are multiple namespaces, and all may trigger timeout at the same
> time, so looks the sync is still needed.

Yes, we still need this syncing because each namespace has a different
request queue with their own timeout work.

As an alternative, I looked into having timeout work per tagset rather
than per request-queue, but that turned into a more complicated change
than this patch.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-16 13:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-13 20:56 [PATCHv4 0/4] nvme timeout updates Keith Busch
2018-07-13 20:56 ` [PATCHv4 1/4] nvme: Sync request queues on reset Keith Busch
2018-07-16  8:52   ` jianchao.wang
2018-07-16 10:39     ` Ming Lei
2018-07-16 13:30       ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-07-17  5:37         ` jianchao.wang
2018-07-16 14:51   ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-07-16 15:37     ` Keith Busch
2018-07-16 16:36       ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-07-16 17:12         ` Keith Busch
2018-07-17 13:40           ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-17 14:54             ` Keith Busch
2018-07-18 11:46           ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-07-18 13:52             ` Keith Busch
2018-07-13 20:56 ` [PATCHv4 2/4] nvme: Start controller in own work queue Keith Busch
2018-07-16 15:00   ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-07-16 15:35     ` Keith Busch
2018-07-13 20:56 ` [PATCHv4 3/4] nvme: Introduce frozen controller state Keith Busch
2018-07-16  9:02   ` jianchao.wang
2018-07-16 11:09   ` Ming Lei
2018-07-16 13:36     ` Keith Busch
2018-07-17  1:23       ` Ming Lei
2018-07-17  5:49         ` jianchao.wang
2018-07-17  7:21           ` Ming Lei
2018-07-17  7:28             ` jianchao.wang
2018-07-17 14:32               ` Keith Busch
2018-07-18  2:57                 ` jianchao.wang
2018-07-17 14:06         ` Keith Busch
2018-07-16 16:34   ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-07-17 16:05     ` James Smart
2018-07-17 16:17       ` Keith Busch
2018-07-18 12:20         ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-07-18 13:53           ` Keith Busch
2018-07-13 20:56 ` [PATCHv4 4/4] nvme-pci: Use controller start work to dispath IO Keith Busch
2018-07-19 19:48 ` [PATCHv4 0/4] nvme timeout updates Scott Bauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180716133059.GB19967@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=keith.busch@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox