From: keith.busch@linux.intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [PATCHv4 2/4] nvme: Start controller in own work queue
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 09:35:41 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180716153540.GA26265@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7647e947-f20c-a0eb-d4b5-f19748e2b4bd@grimberg.me>
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018@06:00:38PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
> > This moves the controller start from the reset_work to its own work.
> > This is preparing for the possibility of running IO when starting the
> > controller, which we shouldn't do from the reset_work since we need that
> > context to handle timeouts.
>
> What do you mean handle timeouts? the timeout handler is not invoked
> from the reset_work thread.
Not directly. If you dispatch blocking IO from the reset_work, the timeout
handler will eventually be invoked if the IO never returns. This series
is really just trying to get all the blocking IO out of the reset_work
because IO may requeue when the timeout handler disables the controller,
and we need the reset_work to restart the controller.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-16 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-13 20:56 [PATCHv4 0/4] nvme timeout updates Keith Busch
2018-07-13 20:56 ` [PATCHv4 1/4] nvme: Sync request queues on reset Keith Busch
2018-07-16 8:52 ` jianchao.wang
2018-07-16 10:39 ` Ming Lei
2018-07-16 13:30 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-17 5:37 ` jianchao.wang
2018-07-16 14:51 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-07-16 15:37 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-16 16:36 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-07-16 17:12 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-17 13:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-17 14:54 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-18 11:46 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-07-18 13:52 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-13 20:56 ` [PATCHv4 2/4] nvme: Start controller in own work queue Keith Busch
2018-07-16 15:00 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-07-16 15:35 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-07-13 20:56 ` [PATCHv4 3/4] nvme: Introduce frozen controller state Keith Busch
2018-07-16 9:02 ` jianchao.wang
2018-07-16 11:09 ` Ming Lei
2018-07-16 13:36 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-17 1:23 ` Ming Lei
2018-07-17 5:49 ` jianchao.wang
2018-07-17 7:21 ` Ming Lei
2018-07-17 7:28 ` jianchao.wang
2018-07-17 14:32 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-18 2:57 ` jianchao.wang
2018-07-17 14:06 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-16 16:34 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-07-17 16:05 ` James Smart
2018-07-17 16:17 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-18 12:20 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-07-18 13:53 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-13 20:56 ` [PATCHv4 4/4] nvme-pci: Use controller start work to dispath IO Keith Busch
2018-07-19 19:48 ` [PATCHv4 0/4] nvme timeout updates Scott Bauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180716153540.GA26265@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).