From: keith.busch@linux.intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [PATCHv4 1/4] nvme: Sync request queues on reset
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 08:54:35 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180717145435.GD26925@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180717134048.GA16134@lst.de>
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018@03:40:48PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018@11:12:33AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018@07:36:41PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> > > > The only reason we need this is because each namespace has its own
> > > > request queue with their own timeout work. We don't want all of these
> > > > scheduling multiple controller resets, so the sync here just ensures
> > > > that there is no active timeout work that's about to schedule another
> > > > reset while we're already resetting the controller.
> > >
> > > But scheduling a reset while a reset is running should not succeed. You
> > > should not be able to change state RESETTING -> RESETTING
> >
> > Timeout handlers call nvme_dev_disable prior to the reset schedule
> > attempt, which is the part that we want to prevent occuring concurrently
> > with an already scheduled reset.
>
> Is there any good way we can get rid of these out of state machine
> nvme_dev_disable calls? It might not be easy, but I think it is
> going to help us in the long run.
Possibly, I'll stare at this a bit more.
> I also think your original idea of a single work_struct per tag set
> for error handling might be a good idea. This is similar to the
> per-host eh thread SCSI had forever, so it might also help SCSI by
> getting rid of that and running directly from the block timeout
> context.
Okay, I'll re-examine that option again. It gets a little messy with
the legacy request interface, but that's okay.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-17 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-13 20:56 [PATCHv4 0/4] nvme timeout updates Keith Busch
2018-07-13 20:56 ` [PATCHv4 1/4] nvme: Sync request queues on reset Keith Busch
2018-07-16 8:52 ` jianchao.wang
2018-07-16 10:39 ` Ming Lei
2018-07-16 13:30 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-17 5:37 ` jianchao.wang
2018-07-16 14:51 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-07-16 15:37 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-16 16:36 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-07-16 17:12 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-17 13:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-07-17 14:54 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-07-18 11:46 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-07-18 13:52 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-13 20:56 ` [PATCHv4 2/4] nvme: Start controller in own work queue Keith Busch
2018-07-16 15:00 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-07-16 15:35 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-13 20:56 ` [PATCHv4 3/4] nvme: Introduce frozen controller state Keith Busch
2018-07-16 9:02 ` jianchao.wang
2018-07-16 11:09 ` Ming Lei
2018-07-16 13:36 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-17 1:23 ` Ming Lei
2018-07-17 5:49 ` jianchao.wang
2018-07-17 7:21 ` Ming Lei
2018-07-17 7:28 ` jianchao.wang
2018-07-17 14:32 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-18 2:57 ` jianchao.wang
2018-07-17 14:06 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-16 16:34 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-07-17 16:05 ` James Smart
2018-07-17 16:17 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-18 12:20 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-07-18 13:53 ` Keith Busch
2018-07-13 20:56 ` [PATCHv4 4/4] nvme-pci: Use controller start work to dispath IO Keith Busch
2018-07-19 19:48 ` [PATCHv4 0/4] nvme timeout updates Scott Bauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180717145435.GD26925@localhost.localdomain \
--to=keith.busch@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).