linux-nvme.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ming.lei@redhat.com (Ming Lei)
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Introduce a light-weight queue close feature
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 20:57:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180906125659.GA31250@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b7074098-ab79-53b2-5cc6-25f859c4c666@oracle.com>

On Thu, Sep 06, 2018@09:51:43AM +0800, jianchao.wang wrote:
> Hi Ming
> 
> On 09/06/2018 05:27 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 05, 2018@12:09:43PM +0800, Jianchao Wang wrote:
> >> Dear all
> >>
> >> As we know, queue freeze is used to stop new IO comming in and drain
> >> the request queue. And the draining queue here is necessary, because
> >> queue freeze kills the percpu-ref q_usage_counter and need to drain
> >> the q_usage_counter before switch it back to percpu mode. This could
> >> be a trouble when we just want to prevent new IO.
> >>
> >> In nvme-pci, nvme_dev_disable freezes queues to prevent new IO.
> >> nvme_reset_work will unfreeze and wait to drain the queues. However,
> >> if IO timeout at the moment, no body could do recovery as nvme_reset_work
> >> is waiting. We will encounter IO hang.
> > 
> > As we discussed this nvme time issue before, I have pointed out that
> > this is because of blk_mq_unfreeze_queue()'s limit which requires that
> > unfreeze can only be done when this queue ref counter drops to zero.
> > 
> > For this nvme timeout case, we may relax the limit, for example,
> > introducing another API of blk_freeze_queue_stop() as counter-pair of
> > blk_freeze_queue_start(), and simply switch the percpu-ref to percpu mode
> > from atomic mode inside the new API.
> 
> Looks like we cannot switch a percpu-ref to percpu mode directly w/o drain it.
> Some references maybe lost.
> 
> static void __percpu_ref_switch_to_percpu(struct percpu_ref *ref)
> {
> 	unsigned long __percpu *percpu_count = percpu_count_ptr(ref);
> 	int cpu;
> 
> 	BUG_ON(!percpu_count);
> 
> 	if (!(ref->percpu_count_ptr & __PERCPU_REF_ATOMIC))
> 		return;
> 
> 	atomic_long_add(PERCPU_COUNT_BIAS, &ref->count);
> 
> 	/*
> 	 * Restore per-cpu operation.  smp_store_release() is paired
> 	 * with READ_ONCE() in __ref_is_percpu() and guarantees that the
> 	 * zeroing is visible to all percpu accesses which can see the
> 	 * following __PERCPU_REF_ATOMIC clearing.
> 	 */
> 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> 		*per_cpu_ptr(percpu_count, cpu) = 0;
> 
> 	smp_store_release(&ref->percpu_count_ptr,
> 			  ref->percpu_count_ptr & ~__PERCPU_REF_ATOMIC);

Before REF_ATOMIC is cleared, all counting is done on the atomic type
of &ref->count, and it is easy to keep the reference counter at
ATOMIC mode. Also the reference counter can only be READ at atomic mode.

So could you explain a bit how the lost may happen? And it is lost at
atomic mode or percpu mode?

> }
> 
> > 
> >>
> >> So introduce a light-weight queue close feature in this patch set
> >> which could prevent new IO and needn't drain the queue.
> > 
> > Frankly speaking, IMO, it may not be an good idea to mess up the fast path
> > just for handling the extremely unusual timeout event. The same is true
> > for doing the preemp only stuff, as you saw I have posted patchset for
> > killing it.
> > 
> 
> In normal case, it is just a judgment like 
> 
> 	if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(q->queue_gate))
> 
> It should not be a big deal.

Adding this stuff in fast path is quite difficult to verify its correctness
because it is really lockless, or even barrier-less.

Not to mention, READ_ONCE() implies one barrier of smp_read_barrier_depends().

Thanks,
Ming

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-06 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-05  4:09 [PATCH 0/3] Introduce a light-weight queue close feature Jianchao Wang
2018-09-05  4:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] blk-core: migrate preempt-only mode to queue_gate Jianchao Wang
2018-09-05  4:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] blk-core: introduce queue close feature Jianchao Wang
2018-09-05 15:57   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-09-06  1:31     ` jianchao.wang
2018-09-05  4:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] nvme-pci: use queue close instead of queue freeze Jianchao Wang
2018-09-05 22:09   ` Ming Lei
2018-09-06  1:28     ` jianchao.wang
2018-09-06 13:07       ` Ming Lei
2018-09-06 14:19         ` jianchao.wang
2018-09-07 16:23           ` Ming Lei
2018-09-10  1:49             ` jianchao.wang
2018-09-05 15:48 ` [PATCH 0/3] Introduce a light-weight queue close feature Bart Van Assche
2018-09-06  1:35   ` jianchao.wang
2018-09-05 21:27 ` Ming Lei
2018-09-06  1:51   ` jianchao.wang
2018-09-06 12:57     ` Ming Lei [this message]
2018-09-06 13:55       ` jianchao.wang
2018-09-07 16:21         ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180906125659.GA31250@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).