From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch) Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 10:48:06 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] blk-mq: Export iterating all tagged requests In-Reply-To: <11e02aa5-b0cb-b4cf-0af4-da3db8db9e36@grimberg.me> References: <20181130202635.11145-1-keith.busch@intel.com> <823fc3bf-78a4-c8fb-c80c-e3944f320af0@kernel.dk> <20181201164804.GB19557@lst.de> <9346f289-f265-e2ee-2d2c-c97973b45e23@suse.de> <8cd9a950-6605-6387-e4d4-4346a46da781@grimberg.me> <20181204154559.GJ14775@localhost.localdomain> <11e02aa5-b0cb-b4cf-0af4-da3db8db9e36@grimberg.me> Message-ID: <20181204174806.GA16751@localhost.localdomain> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018@09:38:29AM -0800, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > > > > > Yes, I'm very much in favour of this, too. > > > > We always have this IMO slightly weird notion of stopping the queue, set > > > > some error flags in the driver, then _restarting_ the queue, just so > > > > that the driver then sees the error flag and terminates the requests. > > > > Which I always found quite counter-intuitive. > > > > > > What about requests that come in after the iteration runs? how are those > > > terminated? > > > > If we've reached a dead state, I think you'd want to start a queue freeze > > before running the terminating iterator. > > Its not necessarily dead, in fabrics we need to handle disconnections > that last for a while before we are able to reconnect (for a variety of > reasons) and we need a way to fail I/O for failover (or requeue, or > block its up to the upper layer). Its less of a "last resort" action > like in the pci case. > > Does this guarantee that after freeze+iter we won't get queued with any > other request? If not then we still need to unfreeze and fail at > queue_rq. It sounds like there are different scenarios to consider. For the dead controller, we call blk_cleanup_queue() at the end which ends callers who blocked on entering. If you're doing a failover, you'd replace the freeze with a current path update in order to prevent new requests from entering. In either case, you don't need checks in queue_rq. The queue_rq check is redundant with the quiesce state that blk-mq already provides. Once quiesced, the proposed iterator can handle the final termination of the request, perform failover, or some other lld specific action depending on your situation.