From: kbusch@kernel.org (Keith Busch)
Subject: PROBLEM: call trace triggered in 5.1.1 in drivers/nvme/host/pci.c, 5.0.11 ok
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 16:22:01 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190514222201.GD19977@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC=wYCFzdNNiaXWoAEMoj00f5enk3mJzQrUL9CjZD2RRRxAXNg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, May 15, 2019@08:14:22AM +1000, Adam Carter wrote:
> >
> > Or this one posted yesterday for that matter:
> >
> > https://marc.info/?l=linux-block&m=155772952511144&w=2
> >
>
> I have re-tested and the issue is fixed for me with the above. Many thanks.
Thank you for verifying.
Replying in plain-text for the mailing lists (they'll reject html
messages, just for future reference), and I assume your response is
providing a Tested-by notice for Christoph's patch.
> Here's my working;
> cd /usr/src
> cp -a linux-5.1.1-gentoo linux-5.1.1-gentoo-patched
> rm linux
> ln -s linux-5.1.1-gentoo-patched linux
> cd linux
> cp ~adam/block.patch
> patch -p0 <block.patch
> patching file block/blk-settings.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 309 (offset -1 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 760 (offset 15 lines).
> make -j8 && make modules_install && make install && grub-mkconfig -o
> /boot/grub/grub.cfg && emerge -1 virtualbox-modules
>
> Where block.patch is;
> # cat block.patch
> --- block/blk-settings.c
> +++ block/blk-settings.c
> @@ -310,6 +310,9 @@ void blk_queue_max_segment_size(struct request_queue
> *q, unsigned int max_size)
> __func__, max_size);
> }
>
> + /* see blk_queue_virt_boundary() for the explanation */
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(q->limits.virt_boundary_mask);
> +
> q->limits.max_segment_size = max_size;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_max_segment_size);
> @@ -742,6 +745,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_segment_boundary);
> void blk_queue_virt_boundary(struct request_queue *q, unsigned long mask)
> {
> q->limits.virt_boundary_mask = mask;
> +
> + /*
> + * Devices that require a virtual boundary do not support
> scatter/gather
> + * I/O natively, but instead require a descriptor list entry for each
> + * page (which might not be idential to the Linux PAGE_SIZE). Because
> + * of that they are not limited by our notion of "segment size".
> + */
> + q->limits.max_segment_size = UINT_MAX;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_queue_virt_boundary);
>
> --
> 2.20.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-14 22:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAC=wYCGgPQPjUUjQTZh4H7b8WRQFGmbKCBRAq75g1BXjBR0L0Q@mail.gmail.com>
2019-05-14 5:20 ` PROBLEM: call trace triggered in 5.1.1 in drivers/nvme/host/pci.c, 5.0.11 ok Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <CAC=wYCFhKR5YrAwL1agz=USg3DAkx5BtXAfv64nOfTrwTji40Q@mail.gmail.com>
2019-05-14 5:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <CAC=wYCECcfqoDDMcgVj-4dAEUxNpY62vAEMOD8-eGrZK8wOV-g@mail.gmail.com>
2019-05-14 13:54 ` Keith Busch
2019-05-14 14:12 ` Ming Lei
2019-05-14 14:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-14 14:23 ` Keith Busch
[not found] ` <CAC=wYCFzdNNiaXWoAEMoj00f5enk3mJzQrUL9CjZD2RRRxAXNg@mail.gmail.com>
2019-05-14 22:22 ` Keith Busch [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190514222201.GD19977@localhost.localdomain \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox