From: ming.lei@redhat.com (Ming Lei)
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] nvme: reset request timeouts during fw activation
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 18:19:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190523101953.GA18805@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190522174812.5597-3-keith.busch@intel.com>
On Wed, May 22, 2019@11:48:12AM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> The nvme controller may pause command processing during firmware
> activation. The driver will quiesce queues during this time, but commands
> dispatched prior to the notification will not be processed until the
> hardware completes this activation.
>
> We do not want those requests to time out while the hardware is in
> this paused state as we don't expect those commands to complete during
> this time, and that handling will interfere with the firmware activation
> process.
>
> In addition to quiescing the queues, halt timeout detection during the
> paused state and reset the dispatched request deadlines when the hardware
> exists that state. This action applies to IO and admin queues.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index 1b7c2afd84cb..37a9a66ada22 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ static dev_t nvme_chr_devt;
> static struct class *nvme_class;
> static struct class *nvme_subsys_class;
>
> +static void nvme_reset_queues(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl);
> static int nvme_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk);
> static void nvme_put_subsystem(struct nvme_subsystem *subsys);
> static void nvme_remove_invalid_namespaces(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl,
> @@ -3605,6 +3606,11 @@ static void nvme_fw_act_work(struct work_struct *work)
> msecs_to_jiffies(admin_timeout * 1000);
>
> nvme_stop_queues(ctrl);
> + nvme_sync_queues(ctrl);
> +
> + blk_mq_quiesce_queue(ctrl->admin_q);
> + blk_sync_queue(ctrl->admin_q);
blk_sync_queue() may not halt timeout detection completely since the
timeout work may reset timer again.
Also reset still may come during activating FW, is that a problem?
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-23 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-22 17:48 [PATCH 0/2] Reset timeout for paused hardware Keith Busch
2019-05-22 17:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] blk-mq: provide way to reset rq deadline Keith Busch
2019-05-22 17:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme: reset request timeouts during fw activation Keith Busch
2019-05-23 10:19 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2019-05-23 13:34 ` Keith Busch
2019-05-23 14:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-22 20:20 ` [PATCH 0/2] Reset timeout for paused hardware Bart Van Assche
2019-05-22 20:28 ` Keith Busch
2019-05-23 10:04 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-05-23 3:29 ` Ming Lei
2019-05-23 3:48 ` Keith Busch
2019-05-23 10:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23 13:23 ` Keith Busch
2019-05-23 14:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-05-23 14:19 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190523101953.GA18805@ming.t460p \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox