From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: axboe@fb.com, John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
hch@lst.de, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, sagi@grimberg.me
Subject: [PATCH] nvme-pci: fix "slimmer CQ head update"
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 23:07:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200507200704.GA16009@avx2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200507155852.GB2621480@dhcp-10-100-145-180.wdl.wdc.com>
Pre-incrementing ->cq_head can't be done in memory because OOB value
can be observed by another context.
This devalues space savings compared to original code :-\
$ ./scripts/bloat-o-meter ../vmlinux-000 ../obj/vmlinux
add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/4 up/down: 0/-32 (-32)
Function old new delta
nvme_poll_irqdisable 464 456 -8
nvme_poll 455 447 -8
nvme_irq 388 380 -8
nvme_dev_disable 955 947 -8
But the code is minimal now: one read for head, one read for q_depth,
one increment, one comparison, single instruction phase bit update and
one write for new head.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Reported-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Tested-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Fixes: e2a366a4b0feaeb ("nvme-pci: slimmer CQ head update")
---
drivers/nvme/host/pci.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
@@ -973,9 +973,13 @@ static inline void nvme_handle_cqe(struct nvme_queue *nvmeq, u16 idx)
static inline void nvme_update_cq_head(struct nvme_queue *nvmeq)
{
- if (++nvmeq->cq_head == nvmeq->q_depth) {
+ u16 tmp = nvmeq->cq_head + 1;
+
+ if (tmp == nvmeq->q_depth) {
nvmeq->cq_head = 0;
nvmeq->cq_phase ^= 1;
+ } else {
+ nvmeq->cq_head = tmp;
}
}
_______________________________________________
linux-nvme mailing list
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-07 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-28 18:45 [PATCH] nvme-pci: slimmer CQ head update Alexey Dobriyan
2020-02-29 5:53 ` Keith Busch
2020-05-06 11:03 ` John Garry
2020-05-06 12:47 ` Keith Busch
2020-05-06 13:24 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2020-05-06 13:44 ` John Garry
2020-05-06 14:01 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2020-05-06 14:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-06 16:26 ` John Garry
2020-05-06 16:31 ` Will Deacon
2020-05-06 16:52 ` Robin Murphy
2020-05-06 17:02 ` John Garry
2020-05-07 8:18 ` John Garry
2020-05-07 11:04 ` Robin Murphy
2020-05-07 13:55 ` John Garry
2020-05-07 14:23 ` Keith Busch
2020-05-07 15:11 ` John Garry
2020-05-07 15:35 ` Keith Busch
2020-05-07 15:41 ` John Garry
2020-05-08 16:16 ` Keith Busch
2020-05-08 17:04 ` John Garry
2020-05-07 16:26 ` Robin Murphy
2020-05-07 17:35 ` Keith Busch
2020-05-07 17:44 ` Will Deacon
2020-05-07 18:06 ` Keith Busch
2020-05-08 11:40 ` Will Deacon
2020-05-08 14:07 ` Keith Busch
2020-05-08 15:34 ` Keith Busch
2020-05-06 14:44 ` Keith Busch
2020-05-07 15:58 ` Keith Busch
2020-05-07 20:07 ` Alexey Dobriyan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200507200704.GA16009@avx2 \
--to=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox