Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Niklas Cassel <Niklas.Cassel@wdc.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] nvme: fix identify error status silent ignore
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 08:55:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200629085509.GA525275@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200626174629.115730-1-sagi@grimberg.me>

On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 10:46:29AM -0700, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> Patch 59c7c3caaaf8 intended to only silently ignore
> non retry-able errors (DNR bit set) such that we can still
> identify misbehaving controllers, and in the other hand
> propagate retry-able errors (DNR bit cleared) so we don't
> wrongly abandon a namespace just because it happens to be
> temporarily inaccessible.
> 
> The goal remains the same as the original commit where this
> was introduced but unfortunately had the logic backwards.
> 
> Fixes: 59c7c3caaaf8 ("nvme: fix possible hang when ns
> scanning fails during error recovery")
> Reported-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
> ---
> Changes from v2:
> - added comment on non-trivial code
> 
> Changes from v1:
> - remove paranthesis
> 
>  drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 10 ++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index 2afed32d3892..92dc2327bf3a 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -1128,9 +1128,15 @@ static int nvme_identify_ns_descs(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, unsigned nsid,
>  			"Identify Descriptors failed (%d)\n", status);
>  		 /*
>  		  * Don't treat an error as fatal, as we potentially already
> -		  * have a NGUID or EUI-64.
> +		  * have a NGUID or EUI-64. If we failed with DNR set, we want
> +		  * to silently ignore the error as we can still identify
> +		  * the device, but if the status has DNR set, we want
> +		  * to propogate the error back specifically for the disk

s/propogate/propagate/

Perhaps this minor nit could be fixed up while applying?


Kind regards,
Niklas

> +		  * revalidation flow to make sure we don't abandon the
> +		  * device just because of a temporal retry-able error (such
> +		  * as path of transport errors).
>  		  */
> -		if (status > 0 && !(status & NVME_SC_DNR))
> +		if (status > 0 && status & NVME_SC_DNR)
>  			status = 0;
>  		goto free_data;
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-nvme mailing list
> Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-29  8:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-26 17:46 [PATCH v3] nvme: fix identify error status silent ignore Sagi Grimberg
2020-06-29  6:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-29  7:08   ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-06-29 11:49     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-29  8:55 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200629085509.GA525275@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=niklas.cassel@wdc.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox