From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: "Belanger, Martin" <Martin.Belanger@dell.com>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Clarification regarding "nvme discover" and setting IOSQES/IOCQES
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 20:28:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210209032837.GA99682@C02WT3WMHTD6> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cbf91356-e2b4-692b-38d8-22ec00359b8e@grimberg.me>
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 03:01:28PM -0800, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
> > > > Hi Sagi,
> > > >
> > > > Yes. The Discovery Controller currently allows it. The problem, however,
> > > > is that the DC seems to be expecting these values to be non-zero.
> > > >
> > > > I tried setting IOCQES=0 and IOSQES=0, which the DC allows (i.e. Prop
> > > > Set return status=0). However, when I follow this by a "Property Get -
> > > > Controller Status", the Status now shows "Controller Fatal Status (CFS)"
> > > > (see Base specs - Figure 79).
> > >
> > > Yes, the oversight extends to the target that expects it (shared code
> > > with I/O controllers).
> > >
> > > Does this fix your issue?
> >
> > Seems like the Identify Controller SQES and CQES fields ought to be
> > updated too, but the spec isn't clear on this. Feels like ECN
> > material...
>
> Yes, we should start with this patch though right?
Yep, your patch looks good.
I was just thinking a generic implementation could align the CC settings with
the ID_CTRL values rather than checking for a discovery controller, but I
noticed the spec didn't provide us that opportunity. That was actually a
misguided thought anyway since we don't even have ID_CTRL data on the initial
CC setting! :)
_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-09 3:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-08 16:32 Clarification regarding "nvme discover" and setting IOSQES/IOCQES Belanger, Martin
2021-02-08 18:16 ` Sagi Grimberg
[not found] ` <SJ0PR19MB454412891E589E03EF8DB948F28F9@SJ0PR19MB4544.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
2021-02-08 18:59 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-08 19:04 ` Keith Busch
2021-02-08 23:01 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-02-09 3:28 ` Keith Busch [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210209032837.GA99682@C02WT3WMHTD6 \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=Martin.Belanger@dell.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox