Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	Keith Busch <keith.busch@wdc.com>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5] nvme: allow to re-attach namespaces after all paths are down
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 18:42:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210608164247.GA12430@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210607133435.138525-1-hare@suse.de>

While I do like the look, I don't see how this could actually work:

>  	} else {
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
> -		if (!is_shared || !head->shared) {
> +		/*
> +		 * If multipath is enabled we might hit an ns head with no
> +		 * paths, but that doesn't indicate it's a shared namespace.
> +		 */
> +		if (!list_empty(&head->list) && (!is_shared || !head->shared)) {
>  			dev_err(ctrl->device,
>  				"Duplicate unshared namespace %d\n", nsid);
>  			goto out_put_ns_head;

When we get here with an existing ns_head with no namespaces attached
to it, we can assume it once had namespaces attached to it.  Because
of that NVME_NSHEAD_DISK_LIVE will be set, and we'll never add the
disk for it again.  Even if we did add the disk again what prevents
adding a disk and removing one from racing with each other?

_______________________________________________
Linux-nvme mailing list
Linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-08 16:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-07 13:34 [PATCHv5] nvme: allow to re-attach namespaces after all paths are down Hannes Reinecke
2021-06-08 16:42 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-06-08 17:44   ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210608164247.GA12430@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=keith.busch@wdc.com \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox