From: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
To: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2] nvme: Add sibling to list after full initialization
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 14:21:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211111132135.19216-1-dwagner@suse.de> (raw)
Adding the newly created namespace before the object is fully
initialized is opening a race with nvme_mpath_revalidate_paths() which
tries to access ns->disk. ns->disk can still be NULL when iterating
over the sibling list.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
---
v2: use list_add_tail_rcu instead of list_add_tail
I got a few bug reports from our customer hitting this
quite often:
RIP: 0010:nvme_mpath_revalidate_paths+0x27/0xb0 [nvme_core]
Code: 44 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 53 48 8b 6f 50 48 8b 55 00 48 8b 85 10 c5 00 00 48 39 d5 48 8b 48 40 74 20 48 8d 42 d0 48 8b 50 20 <48> 3b 4a 40 74 05 f0 80 60 78 ef 48 8b 50 30 48 39 d5 48 8d 42 d0
RSP: 0018:ffffaf1303fffcc0 EFLAGS: 00010283
RAX: ffff95f75ef5c400 RBX: ffff95f71f63aa00 RCX: 0000000000200000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff95f71f63aa00
RBP: ffff95f71b1d0000 R08: 0000000800000000 R09: 00000008ffffffff
R10: 00000000000007be R11: 0000000000000384 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: ffff95f71b1d0000 R14: ffff95f721d79338 R15: ffff95f71f63aa00
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff95f77f9c0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000000000040 CR3: 000000033940a005 CR4: 00000000003706e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
nvme_update_ns_info+0x15b/0x2f0 [nvme_core]
nvme_alloc_ns+0x27f/0x810 [nvme_core]
nvme_validate_or_alloc_ns+0xbb/0x190 [nvme_core]
nvme_scan_work+0x155/0x2d0 [nvme_core]
process_one_work+0x1f4/0x3e0
worker_thread+0x24c/0x3e0
? process_one_work+0x3e0/0x3e0
kthread+0x10d/0x130
? kthread_park+0xa0/0xa0
ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
This patch fixes the problem reported. I am not totally sure why this
suddenly happens but I guess it is related to 041bd1a1fc73 ("nvme:
only call synchronize_srcu when clearing current path").
drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index 9a2610e147ce..7e43cb31d41e 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -3776,7 +3776,6 @@ static int nvme_init_ns_head(struct nvme_ns *ns, unsigned nsid,
}
}
- list_add_tail_rcu(&ns->siblings, &head->list);
ns->head = head;
mutex_unlock(&ctrl->subsys->lock);
return 0;
@@ -3873,6 +3872,10 @@ static void nvme_alloc_ns(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, unsigned nsid,
if (nvme_update_ns_info(ns, id))
goto out_unlink_ns;
+ mutex_lock(&ctrl->subsys->lock);
+ list_add_tail_rcu(&ns->siblings, &ns->head->list);
+ mutex_unlock(&ctrl->subsys->lock);
+
down_write(&ctrl->namespaces_rwsem);
nvme_ns_add_to_ctrl_list(ns);
up_write(&ctrl->namespaces_rwsem);
--
2.29.2
next reply other threads:[~2021-11-11 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-11 13:21 Daniel Wagner [this message]
2021-11-19 17:10 ` [PATCH v2] nvme: Add sibling to list after full initialization Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-21 10:22 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-23 5:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-23 9:05 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-23 16:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-12-06 13:42 ` Daniel Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211111132135.19216-1-dwagner@suse.de \
--to=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox