From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] blk-mq: rename hctx_lock & hctx_unlock
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2021 10:18:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211119021849.2259254-3-ming.lei@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211119021849.2259254-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>
We have moved srcu from 'struct blk_mq_hw_ctx' into 'struct request_queue',
both hctx_lock and hctx_unlock are run on request queue level, so rename
them as queue_lock and queue_unlock().
And it could be used for supporting Jens's ->queue_rqs(), as suggested
by Keith.
Also it could be extended for driver uses in future.
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 9728a571b009..ba0d0e411b65 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1076,24 +1076,26 @@ void blk_mq_complete_request(struct request *rq)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(blk_mq_complete_request);
-static inline void hctx_unlock(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, int srcu_idx)
- __releases(hctx->srcu)
+static inline void queue_unlock(struct request_queue *q, bool blocking,
+ int srcu_idx)
+ __releases(q->srcu)
{
- if (!(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING))
+ if (!blocking)
rcu_read_unlock();
else
- srcu_read_unlock(hctx->queue->srcu, srcu_idx);
+ srcu_read_unlock(q->srcu, srcu_idx);
}
-static inline void hctx_lock(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, int *srcu_idx)
+static inline void queue_lock(struct request_queue *q, bool blocking,
+ int *srcu_idx)
__acquires(hctx->srcu)
{
- if (!(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING)) {
+ if (!blocking) {
/* shut up gcc false positive */
*srcu_idx = 0;
rcu_read_lock();
} else
- *srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(hctx->queue->srcu);
+ *srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(q->srcu);
}
/**
@@ -1958,6 +1960,7 @@ bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct list_head *list,
static void __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
{
int srcu_idx;
+ bool blocking = hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING;
/*
* We can't run the queue inline with ints disabled. Ensure that
@@ -1965,11 +1968,11 @@ static void __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
*/
WARN_ON_ONCE(in_interrupt());
- might_sleep_if(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING);
+ might_sleep_if(blocking);
- hctx_lock(hctx, &srcu_idx);
+ queue_lock(hctx->queue, blocking, &srcu_idx);
blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests(hctx);
- hctx_unlock(hctx, srcu_idx);
+ queue_unlock(hctx->queue, blocking, srcu_idx);
}
static inline int blk_mq_first_mapped_cpu(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
@@ -2083,6 +2086,7 @@ void blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async)
{
int srcu_idx;
bool need_run;
+ bool blocking = hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING;
/*
* When queue is quiesced, we may be switching io scheduler, or
@@ -2092,10 +2096,10 @@ void blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async)
* And queue will be rerun in blk_mq_unquiesce_queue() if it is
* quiesced.
*/
- hctx_lock(hctx, &srcu_idx);
+ queue_lock(hctx->queue, blocking, &srcu_idx);
need_run = !blk_queue_quiesced(hctx->queue) &&
blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(hctx);
- hctx_unlock(hctx, srcu_idx);
+ queue_unlock(hctx->queue, blocking, srcu_idx);
if (need_run)
__blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(hctx, async, 0);
@@ -2500,10 +2504,11 @@ static void blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
{
blk_status_t ret;
int srcu_idx;
+ bool blocking = hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING;
- might_sleep_if(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING);
+ might_sleep_if(blocking);
- hctx_lock(hctx, &srcu_idx);
+ queue_lock(hctx->queue, blocking, &srcu_idx);
ret = __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(hctx, rq, false, true);
if (ret == BLK_STS_RESOURCE || ret == BLK_STS_DEV_RESOURCE)
@@ -2511,7 +2516,7 @@ static void blk_mq_try_issue_directly(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
else if (ret != BLK_STS_OK)
blk_mq_end_request(rq, ret);
- hctx_unlock(hctx, srcu_idx);
+ queue_unlock(hctx->queue, blocking, srcu_idx);
}
static blk_status_t blk_mq_request_issue_directly(struct request *rq, bool last)
@@ -2519,10 +2524,11 @@ static blk_status_t blk_mq_request_issue_directly(struct request *rq, bool last)
blk_status_t ret;
int srcu_idx;
struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = rq->mq_hctx;
+ bool blocking = hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING;
- hctx_lock(hctx, &srcu_idx);
+ queue_lock(hctx->queue, blocking, &srcu_idx);
ret = __blk_mq_try_issue_directly(hctx, rq, true, last);
- hctx_unlock(hctx, srcu_idx);
+ queue_unlock(hctx->queue, blocking, srcu_idx);
return ret;
}
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-19 2:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-19 2:18 [PATCH 0/5] blk-mq: quiesce improvement Ming Lei
2021-11-19 2:18 ` [PATCH 1/5] blk-mq: move srcu from blk_mq_hw_ctx to request_queue Ming Lei
2021-11-19 4:30 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-11-19 8:10 ` Ming Lei
2021-11-22 7:48 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-22 13:08 ` Ming Lei
2021-11-22 13:47 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-19 2:18 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-11-22 7:53 ` [PATCH 2/5] blk-mq: rename hctx_lock & hctx_unlock Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-22 13:20 ` Ming Lei
2021-11-22 13:50 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-23 0:08 ` Ming Lei
2021-11-23 8:54 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-22 9:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-19 2:18 ` [PATCH 3/5] blk-mq: add helper of blk_mq_global_quiesce_wait() Ming Lei
2021-11-22 7:56 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-22 8:00 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-22 13:26 ` Ming Lei
2021-11-22 13:55 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-23 0:17 ` Ming Lei
2021-11-23 9:00 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-30 2:33 ` Ming Lei
2021-12-08 12:49 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-12-10 2:02 ` Ming Lei
2021-11-19 2:18 ` [PATCH 4/5] nvme: quiesce namespace queue in parallel Ming Lei
2021-11-22 8:07 ` Sagi Grimberg
2021-11-23 0:13 ` Ming Lei
2021-11-19 2:18 ` [PATCH 5/5] scsi: use blk-mq quiesce APIs to implement scsi_host_block Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211119021849.2259254-3-ming.lei@redhat.com \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox