linux-nvme.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: "Markus Blöchl" <markus.bloechl@ipetronik.com>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] nvme: prevent hang on surprise removal of NVMe disk
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 21:17:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220215201738.GA26945@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220214095107.3t5en5a3tosaeoo6@ipetronik.com>

So, I think in th short run setting GD_DEAD is the right thing as a
non-invasive fix, but I'd rather do it in blk_set_queue_dying to also
cover the other drivers with a similar pattern.  blk_set_queue_dying
is never used for cases where q->disk isn't valid so that should be
fine.

In the long run I think we just need to remove the fsync_bdev in
del_gendisk or at least make it conditional.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-15 20:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-14  9:51 [RFC PATCH] nvme: prevent hang on surprise removal of NVMe disk Markus Blöchl
2022-02-15 15:22 ` Keith Busch
2022-02-15 18:47   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15 19:14     ` Keith Busch
2022-02-15 19:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-02-15 19:37   ` Keith Busch
2022-02-16  6:39   ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-02-16 11:18   ` Markus Blöchl
2022-02-16 11:32     ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-02-15 20:17 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-02-16 12:59   ` Markus Blöchl
2022-02-16 13:33     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220215201738.GA26945@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=markus.bloechl@ipetronik.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=sr@denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).