public inbox for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: Chris Leech <cleech@redhat.com>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, hch@lst.de, lengchao@huawei.com,
	dwagner@suse.de, hare@suse.de, mlombard@redhat.com,
	jmeneghi@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] nvme: fix RCU hole that allowed for endless looping in multipath round robin
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 16:34:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220323153414.GA440@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7d9771f2-d86c-25e5-5bee-504e33c5aae7@grimberg.me>

On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 04:54:26PM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
>
> On 3/22/22 00:43, Chris Leech wrote:
>> Make nvme_ns_remove match the assumptions elsewhere.
>>
>> 1) !NVME_NS_READY needs to be srcu synchronized to make sure nothing is
>>     running in __nvme_find_path or nvme_round_robin_path that will
>>     re-assign this ns to current_path.
>>
>> 2) Any matching current_path entries need to be cleared before removing
>>     from the siblings list, to prevent calling nvme_round_robin_path with
>>     an "old" ns that's off list.
>>
>> 3) Finally the list_del_rcu can happen, and then synchronize again
>>     before releasing any reference counts.
>> ---
>>   drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 13 +++++++++----
>>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
>> index fd4720d37cc0..20778dc9224c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
>> @@ -3917,6 +3917,15 @@ static void nvme_ns_remove(struct nvme_ns *ns)
>>   	set_capacity(ns->disk, 0);
>>   	nvme_fault_inject_fini(&ns->fault_inject);
>>   +	/* ensure that !NVME_NS_READY is seen
>> +	 * to prevent this ns going back in current_path
>> +	 */
>> +	synchronize_srcu(&ns->head->srcu);
>> +
>> +	/* wait for concurrent submissions */
>> +	if (nvme_mpath_clear_current_path(ns))
>> +		synchronize_srcu(&ns->head->srcu);
>
> Nothing prevents it from being reselected again.
> This is what drove the placement of this after the
> ns is removed from the head->list. But that was before
> the selection looked into NVME_NS_READY flag...
>
> This looks legit to me...

Yes, this looks pretty sensible.  I'm tempted to just queue it up
for 5.18.


  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-23 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-21 22:43 nvme-multipath: round-robin infinite looping Chris Leech
2022-03-21 22:43 ` kdump details (Re: nvme-multipath: round-robin infinite looping) Chris Leech
2022-03-22 11:16   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-22 15:36     ` Chris Leech
2022-03-21 22:43 ` [RFC PATCH] nvme-multipath: break endless loop in nvme_round_robin_path Chris Leech
2022-03-22 11:17   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-22 12:07     ` Daniel Wagner
2022-03-22 15:42     ` Chris Leech
2022-03-21 22:43 ` [RFC PATCH] nvme: fix RCU hole that allowed for endless looping in multipath round robin Chris Leech
2022-03-23 14:54   ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-03-23 15:34     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-03-23 19:07       ` John Meneghini
2022-04-05 13:14         ` John Meneghini
2022-03-25  6:36   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-25 12:42   ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-04-05 17:25     ` Chris Leech

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220323153414.GA440@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=cleech@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwagner@suse.de \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=jmeneghi@redhat.com \
    --cc=lengchao@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mlombard@redhat.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox