From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: "Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
"Johannes Berg" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"Josef Bacik" <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
"Md. Haris Iqbal" <haris.iqbal@ionos.com>,
"Jack Wang" <jinpu.wang@ionos.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
"Mike Snitzer" <snitzer@kernel.org>, "Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Stefan Haberland" <sth@linux.ibm.com>,
"Jan Hoeppner" <hoeppner@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
nbd@other.debian.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH 04/11] virtio_blk: fix the discard_granularity and discard_alignment queue limits
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 06:53:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220418045314.360785-5-hch@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220418045314.360785-1-hch@lst.de>
The discard_alignment queue limit is named a bit misleading means the
offset into the block device at which the discard granularity starts.
On the other hand the discard_sector_alignment from the virtio 1.1 looks
similar to what Linux uses as discard granularity (even if not very well
described):
"discard_sector_alignment can be used by OS when splitting a request
based on alignment. "
And at least qemu does set it to the discard granularity.
So stop setting the discard_alignment and use the virtio
discard_sector_alignment to set the discard granularity.
Fixes: 1f23816b8eb8 ("virtio_blk: add discard and write zeroes support")
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
---
drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
index 6ccf15253dee1..d624cc8eddc3c 100644
--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
@@ -867,11 +867,12 @@ static int virtblk_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
blk_queue_io_opt(q, blk_size * opt_io_size);
if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_BLK_F_DISCARD)) {
- q->limits.discard_granularity = blk_size;
-
virtio_cread(vdev, struct virtio_blk_config,
discard_sector_alignment, &v);
- q->limits.discard_alignment = v ? v << SECTOR_SHIFT : 0;
+ if (v)
+ q->limits.discard_granularity = v << SECTOR_SHIFT;
+ else
+ q->limits.discard_granularity = blk_size;
virtio_cread(vdev, struct virtio_blk_config,
max_discard_sectors, &v);
--
2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-18 4:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-18 4:53 fix and cleanup discard_alignment handling Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-18 4:53 ` [PATCH 01/11] ubd: don't set the discard_alignment queue limit Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-18 4:53 ` [PATCH 02/11] nbd: " Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-18 4:53 ` [PATCH 03/11] null_blk: " Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-18 8:01 ` [dm-devel] " Damien Le Moal
2022-04-18 21:22 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-04-18 4:53 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-04-18 4:53 ` [PATCH 05/11] dm-zoned: " Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-18 8:00 ` [dm-devel] " Damien Le Moal
2022-04-18 4:53 ` [PATCH 06/11] raid5: " Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-25 21:08 ` Song Liu
2022-04-18 4:53 ` [PATCH 07/11] dasd: " Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-06 12:56 ` Jan Höppner
2022-04-18 4:53 ` [PATCH 08/11] loop: remove a spurious clear of discard_alignment Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-18 8:04 ` [dm-devel] " Damien Le Moal
2022-04-18 21:21 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-04-18 4:53 ` [PATCH 09/11] nvme: " Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-18 8:02 ` [dm-devel] " Damien Le Moal
2022-04-18 21:23 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-04-26 14:25 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-04-18 4:53 ` [PATCH 10/11] rnbd-srv: use bdev_discard_alignment Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-18 8:02 ` [dm-devel] " Damien Le Moal
2022-04-19 4:51 ` Jinpu Wang
2022-04-18 4:53 ` [PATCH 11/11] xen-blkback: " Christoph Hellwig
2022-04-18 8:03 ` [dm-devel] " Damien Le Moal
2022-04-26 4:16 ` fix and cleanup discard_alignment handling Martin K. Petersen
2022-05-02 16:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-03 16:39 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220418045314.360785-5-hch@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=haris.iqbal@ionos.com \
--cc=hoeppner@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jinpu.wang@ionos.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=nbd@other.debian.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=sth@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox