From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
Cc: hch@lst.de, kbusch@kernel.org, sagi@grimberg.me,
james.smart@broadcom.com, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] nvme: set non-mdts limits in nvme_scan_work
Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 10:56:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220518085602.GA8066@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220518064944.4228-1-kch@nvidia.com>
This re-reads the limits everytime a namespace is added or deleted,
is that really such a good idea?
On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 11:49:44PM -0700, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
> In current implementation we set the non-mdts limits by calling
> nvme_init_non_mdts_limits() from nvme_init_ctrl_finish().
> This also tries to set the limits for the discovery controller which
> has no I/O queues resulting in the warning message reported by the
> nvme_log_error() when running blktest nvme/002: -
>
> [ 2005.155946] run blktests nvme/002 at 2022-04-09 16:57:47
> [ 2005.192223] loop: module loaded
> [ 2005.196429] nvmet: adding nsid 1 to subsystem blktests-subsystem-0
> [ 2005.200334] nvmet: adding nsid 1 to subsystem blktests-subsystem-1
>
> <------------------------------SNIP---------------------------------->
>
> [ 2008.958108] nvmet: adding nsid 1 to subsystem blktests-subsystem-997
> [ 2008.962082] nvmet: adding nsid 1 to subsystem blktests-subsystem-998
> [ 2008.966102] nvmet: adding nsid 1 to subsystem blktests-subsystem-999
> [ 2008.973132] nvmet: creating discovery controller 1 for subsystem nqn.2014-08.org.nvmexpress.discovery for NQN testhostnqn.
> *[ 2008.973196] nvme1: Identify(0x6), Invalid Field in Command (sct 0x0 / sc 0x2) MORE DNR*
> [ 2008.974595] nvme nvme1: new ctrl: "nqn.2014-08.org.nvmexpress.discovery"
> [ 2009.103248] nvme nvme1: Removing ctrl: NQN "nqn.2014-08.org.nvmexpress.discovery"
>
> Move the call of nvme_init_non_mdts_limits() to nvme_scan_work() after
> we verify that I/O queues are created since that is a converging point
> for each transport where these limits are actually used.
>
> 1. FC :
> nvme_fc_create_association()
> ...
> nvme_fc_create_io_queues()
> ...
> nvme_start_ctrl()
> nvme_scan_queue()
> nvme_scan_work()
>
> 2. PCIe:-
> nvme_reset_work()
> ...
> nvme_setup_io_queues()
> nvme_create_io_queues()
> nvme_alloc_queue()
> ...
> nvme_start_ctrl()
> nvme_scan_queue()
> nvme_scan_work()
>
> 3. RDMA :-
> nvme_rdma_setup_ctrl()
> ...
> nvme_rdma_configure_io_queues()
> ...
> nvme_start_ctrl()
> nvme_scan_queue()
> nvme_scan_work()
>
> 4. TCP :-
> nvme_tcp_setup_ctrl()
> ...
> nvme_tcp_configure_io_queues()
> ...
> nvme_start_ctrl()
> nvme_scan_queue()
> nvme_scan_work()
>
> * nvme_scan_work()
> ...
> nvme_validate_or_alloc_ns()
> nvme_alloc_ns()
> nvme_update_ns_info()
> nvme_update_disk_info()
> nvme_config_discard() <---
> blk_queue_max_write_zeroes_sectors() <---
>
> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
> ---
> * changes from V1:-
>
> 1. Instead of duplicating the call for nvme_init_non_mdts_limits()
> move it to the nvme_scan_work().
>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 12 ++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index 42f9772abc4d..8cbd70606f09 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -3082,10 +3082,6 @@ int nvme_init_ctrl_finish(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = nvme_init_non_mdts_limits(ctrl);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> -
> ret = nvme_configure_apst(ctrl);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> @@ -4239,11 +4235,19 @@ static void nvme_scan_work(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl =
> container_of(work, struct nvme_ctrl, scan_work);
> + int ret;
>
> /* No tagset on a live ctrl means IO queues could not created */
> if (ctrl->state != NVME_CTRL_LIVE || !ctrl->tagset)
> return;
>
> + ret = nvme_init_non_mdts_limits(ctrl);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_warn(ctrl->device,
> + "reading non-mdts-limits failed: %d\n", ret);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> if (test_and_clear_bit(NVME_AER_NOTICE_NS_CHANGED, &ctrl->events)) {
> dev_info(ctrl->device, "rescanning namespaces.\n");
> nvme_clear_changed_ns_log(ctrl);
> --
> 2.29.0
---end quoted text---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-18 8:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-18 6:49 [PATCH V2] nvme: set non-mdts limits in nvme_scan_work Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-05-18 8:56 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-05-18 14:42 ` Keith Busch
2022-05-18 14:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-18 15:52 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220518085602.GA8066@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox