public inbox for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Granados <j.granados@samsung.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "Kanchan Joshi" <joshi.k@samsung.com>,
	kbusch@kernel.org, sagi@grimberg.me,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, gost.dev@samsung.com,
	k.jensen@samsung.com, "Javier González" <javier.gonz@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] nvme: refactor namespace probing
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 10:11:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220720081154.h24utc2fodremtgk@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220719143703.GA21148@lst.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3606 bytes --]

On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 04:37:03PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 03:00:48PM +0200, Joel Granados wrote:
> > > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> > > @@ -2011,8 +2011,10 @@ static int nvme_update_ns_info_block(struct nvme_ns *ns,
> > > 
> > >        if (blk_queue_is_zoned(ns->queue)) {
> > >                ret = nvme_revalidate_zones(ns);
> > > -               if (ret && !nvme_first_scan(ns->disk))
> > > +               if (ret && !nvme_first_scan(ns->disk)) {
> > > +                       kfree(id);
> > >                        return ret;
> > > +               }
> > >        }
> > > 	
> > 
> > Should we also take care to hide the device?
> > As I read it the call to nvme_revalidate_zones can return a -ENODEV
> > (through blk_revalidate_disk_zones) which is the original condition to
> > hide the block device.
> 
> Yes, I think we need something like the patch below folded in.  This
> unfreezes before setting the hidden flag and setting the ns ready,
> but I can't see why we'd need it frozen for that.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index bbdf0f95331f3..e6025f80744f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -2012,7 +2012,7 @@ static int nvme_update_ns_info_block(struct nvme_ns *ns,
>  	if (blk_queue_is_zoned(ns->queue)) {
>  		ret = nvme_revalidate_zones(ns);
>  		if (ret && !nvme_first_scan(ns->disk))
> -			return ret;
> +			goto out_free_id;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (nvme_ns_head_multipath(ns->head)) {
> @@ -2029,6 +2029,8 @@ static int nvme_update_ns_info_block(struct nvme_ns *ns,
>  	return 0;
>  
>  out_unfreeze:
> +	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(ns->disk->queue);
> +out_free_id:
>  	/*
>  	 * If probing fails due an unsupported feature, hide the block device,
>  	 * but still allow other access.
> @@ -2038,7 +2040,6 @@ static int nvme_update_ns_info_block(struct nvme_ns *ns,
>  		set_bit(NVME_NS_READY, &ns->flags);
>  		ret = 0;
>  	}
> -	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(ns->disk->queue);
>  	kfree(id);
>  	return ret;
>  }

Yes. And with unfreeze in its own goto, we can return with the
out_free_id on success. In this way we do not duplicate the 'kfree' line
and future uses of 'ret' will just work.
Something like this:

diff --git i/drivers/nvme/host/core.c w/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index bbdf0f95331f..8359efbb1d29 100644
--- i/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ w/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -2012,7 +2012,7 @@ static int nvme_update_ns_info_block(struct nvme_ns *ns,
        if (blk_queue_is_zoned(ns->queue)) {
                ret = nvme_revalidate_zones(ns);
                if (ret && !nvme_first_scan(ns->disk))
-                       return ret;
+                       goto out_free_id;
        }
 
        if (nvme_ns_head_multipath(ns->head)) {
@@ -2025,10 +2025,11 @@ static int nvme_update_ns_info_block(struct nvme_ns *ns,
                disk_update_readahead(ns->head->disk);
                blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(ns->head->disk->queue);
        }
-       kfree(id);
-       return 0;
+       goto out_free_id;
 
 out_unfreeze:
+       blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(ns->disk->queue);
+out_free_id:
        /*
         * If probing fails due an unsupported feature, hide the block device,
         * but still allow other access.
@@ -2038,7 +2039,6 @@ static int nvme_update_ns_info_block(struct nvme_ns *ns,
                set_bit(NVME_NS_READY, &ns->flags);
                ret = 0;
        }
-       blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(ns->disk->queue);
        kfree(id);
        return ret;
 }


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-20  8:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-18  5:24 enable generic interface (/dev/ngX) for unknown command sets v2 Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-18  5:24 ` [PATCH 1/5] nvme: rename nvme_validate_or_alloc_ns to nvme_scan_ns Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-19 13:07   ` Joel Granados
2022-07-18  5:25 ` [PATCH 2/5] nvme: generalize the nvme_multi_css check in nvme_scan_ns Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-18  5:25 ` [PATCH 3/5] nvme: refactor namespace probing Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-19  7:08   ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-07-19 13:00     ` Joel Granados
2022-07-19 14:37       ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-20  8:11         ` Joel Granados [this message]
2022-07-20  8:19   ` Joel Granados
2022-07-20  9:02     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-20 12:15       ` Joel Granados
2022-07-18  5:25 ` [PATCH 4/5] nvme: factor out a nvme_ns_is_readonly helper Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-18  5:25 ` [PATCH 5/5] nvme: enable generic interface (/dev/ngXnY) for unknown command sets Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-21 22:14 ` enable generic interface (/dev/ngX) for unknown command sets v2 Sagi Grimberg
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-07-13  5:49 enable generic interface (/dev/ngX) for unknown command sets Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-13  5:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] nvme: refactor namespace probing Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-13  9:21   ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-07-13 10:16     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-13 11:29       ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-07-13 10:17   ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-07-13 11:27     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220720081154.h24utc2fodremtgk@localhost \
    --to=j.granados@samsung.com \
    --cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=javier.gonz@samsung.com \
    --cc=joshi.k@samsung.com \
    --cc=k.jensen@samsung.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox