From: Joel Granados <j.granados@samsung.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "Kanchan Joshi" <joshi.k@samsung.com>,
kbusch@kernel.org, sagi@grimberg.me,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, gost.dev@samsung.com,
k.jensen@samsung.com, "Javier González" <javier.gonz@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] nvme: refactor namespace probing
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 10:11:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220720081154.h24utc2fodremtgk@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220719143703.GA21148@lst.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3606 bytes --]
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 04:37:03PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 03:00:48PM +0200, Joel Granados wrote:
> > > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> > > @@ -2011,8 +2011,10 @@ static int nvme_update_ns_info_block(struct nvme_ns *ns,
> > >
> > > if (blk_queue_is_zoned(ns->queue)) {
> > > ret = nvme_revalidate_zones(ns);
> > > - if (ret && !nvme_first_scan(ns->disk))
> > > + if (ret && !nvme_first_scan(ns->disk)) {
> > > + kfree(id);
> > > return ret;
> > > + }
> > > }
> > >
> >
> > Should we also take care to hide the device?
> > As I read it the call to nvme_revalidate_zones can return a -ENODEV
> > (through blk_revalidate_disk_zones) which is the original condition to
> > hide the block device.
>
> Yes, I think we need something like the patch below folded in. This
> unfreezes before setting the hidden flag and setting the ns ready,
> but I can't see why we'd need it frozen for that.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index bbdf0f95331f3..e6025f80744f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -2012,7 +2012,7 @@ static int nvme_update_ns_info_block(struct nvme_ns *ns,
> if (blk_queue_is_zoned(ns->queue)) {
> ret = nvme_revalidate_zones(ns);
> if (ret && !nvme_first_scan(ns->disk))
> - return ret;
> + goto out_free_id;
> }
>
> if (nvme_ns_head_multipath(ns->head)) {
> @@ -2029,6 +2029,8 @@ static int nvme_update_ns_info_block(struct nvme_ns *ns,
> return 0;
>
> out_unfreeze:
> + blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(ns->disk->queue);
> +out_free_id:
> /*
> * If probing fails due an unsupported feature, hide the block device,
> * but still allow other access.
> @@ -2038,7 +2040,6 @@ static int nvme_update_ns_info_block(struct nvme_ns *ns,
> set_bit(NVME_NS_READY, &ns->flags);
> ret = 0;
> }
> - blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(ns->disk->queue);
> kfree(id);
> return ret;
> }
Yes. And with unfreeze in its own goto, we can return with the
out_free_id on success. In this way we do not duplicate the 'kfree' line
and future uses of 'ret' will just work.
Something like this:
diff --git i/drivers/nvme/host/core.c w/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index bbdf0f95331f..8359efbb1d29 100644
--- i/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ w/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -2012,7 +2012,7 @@ static int nvme_update_ns_info_block(struct nvme_ns *ns,
if (blk_queue_is_zoned(ns->queue)) {
ret = nvme_revalidate_zones(ns);
if (ret && !nvme_first_scan(ns->disk))
- return ret;
+ goto out_free_id;
}
if (nvme_ns_head_multipath(ns->head)) {
@@ -2025,10 +2025,11 @@ static int nvme_update_ns_info_block(struct nvme_ns *ns,
disk_update_readahead(ns->head->disk);
blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(ns->head->disk->queue);
}
- kfree(id);
- return 0;
+ goto out_free_id;
out_unfreeze:
+ blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(ns->disk->queue);
+out_free_id:
/*
* If probing fails due an unsupported feature, hide the block device,
* but still allow other access.
@@ -2038,7 +2039,6 @@ static int nvme_update_ns_info_block(struct nvme_ns *ns,
set_bit(NVME_NS_READY, &ns->flags);
ret = 0;
}
- blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(ns->disk->queue);
kfree(id);
return ret;
}
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 659 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-20 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-18 5:24 enable generic interface (/dev/ngX) for unknown command sets v2 Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-18 5:24 ` [PATCH 1/5] nvme: rename nvme_validate_or_alloc_ns to nvme_scan_ns Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-19 13:07 ` Joel Granados
2022-07-18 5:25 ` [PATCH 2/5] nvme: generalize the nvme_multi_css check in nvme_scan_ns Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-18 5:25 ` [PATCH 3/5] nvme: refactor namespace probing Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-19 7:08 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-07-19 13:00 ` Joel Granados
2022-07-19 14:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-20 8:11 ` Joel Granados [this message]
2022-07-20 8:19 ` Joel Granados
2022-07-20 9:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-20 12:15 ` Joel Granados
2022-07-18 5:25 ` [PATCH 4/5] nvme: factor out a nvme_ns_is_readonly helper Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-18 5:25 ` [PATCH 5/5] nvme: enable generic interface (/dev/ngXnY) for unknown command sets Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-21 22:14 ` enable generic interface (/dev/ngX) for unknown command sets v2 Sagi Grimberg
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-07-13 5:49 enable generic interface (/dev/ngX) for unknown command sets Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-13 5:49 ` [PATCH 3/5] nvme: refactor namespace probing Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-13 9:21 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-07-13 10:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-07-13 11:29 ` Sagi Grimberg
2022-07-13 10:17 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-07-13 11:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220720081154.h24utc2fodremtgk@localhost \
--to=j.granados@samsung.com \
--cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=javier.gonz@samsung.com \
--cc=joshi.k@samsung.com \
--cc=k.jensen@samsung.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox