public inbox for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
To: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>,
	Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] nvme: scan sequentially only when list scan unsupported
Date: Mon,  7 Nov 2022 12:54:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221107195443.2176099-1-ushankar@purestorage.com> (raw)

Currently, if nvme_scan_ns_list fails, nvme_scan_work will fall back to
a sequential scan. nvme_scan_ns_list can fail for a variety of reasons,
e.g. transient transport issue. And the resulting sequential scan can be
extremely expensive on controllers reporting an NN value close to the
maximum allowed (>4 billion). Avoid sequential scans wherever possible
by only falling back to them if nvme_scan_ns_list fails due to
controller non-support of Identify NS List. This breaks (noncompliant)
devices that claim to support version NVME_VS(1, 1, 0) or later, but
don't support Identify NS List. Such devices can be made to work again
using the existing NVME_QUIRK_IDENTIFY_CNS.

Signed-off-by: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
---
Changes from v1:
- Move limited_cns check from nvme_scan_ns_list to nvme_scan_work
- Move note about devices that may break with this change into commit
  message

 drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index 0090dc0b3ae6..5abd8d4c6d9b 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -4425,9 +4425,6 @@ static int nvme_scan_ns_list(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
 	u32 prev = 0;
 	int ret = 0, i;
 
-	if (nvme_ctrl_limited_cns(ctrl))
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-
 	ns_list = kzalloc(NVME_IDENTIFY_DATA_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!ns_list)
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -4535,8 +4532,10 @@ static void nvme_scan_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	}
 
 	mutex_lock(&ctrl->scan_lock);
-	if (nvme_scan_ns_list(ctrl) != 0)
+	if (nvme_ctrl_limited_cns(ctrl))
 		nvme_scan_ns_sequential(ctrl);
+	else
+		nvme_scan_ns_list(ctrl);
 	mutex_unlock(&ctrl->scan_lock);
 }
 

base-commit: d30a909f9bb5283e701a5fdfffac763ef57a3e7c
-- 
2.25.1



             reply	other threads:[~2022-11-07 19:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-07 19:54 Uday Shankar [this message]
2022-11-08  2:30 ` [PATCH v2] nvme: scan sequentially only when list scan unsupported Guixin Liu
2022-11-08  7:25   ` Guixin Liu
2022-11-08 23:38 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-11-08 23:41 ` Keith Busch
2022-11-09  6:23   ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-11-09 21:04     ` Uday Shankar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221107195443.2176099-1-ushankar@purestorage.com \
    --to=ushankar@purestorage.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox