From: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] nvme: don't allow unprivileged passthrough of commands that have effects
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 13:54:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221215082410.GB27656@test-zns> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221215081829.GA3816@lst.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 637 bytes --]
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 09:18:29AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 12:44:05PM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
>> So even for operation that do not alter anything (e.g. nvme_cmd_read)
>> nvme_is_write will return false, but nvme_command_effects will return
>> true and we will ask for FMODE_WRITE. Is that intentional?
>>
>> I think doing "nvme_command_effects(ctrl, ns, opcode) &
>> ~NVME_CMD_EFFECTS_CSUPP"
>> is better to avoid that?
>
>Take a look at patch 6.
But that patch still takes NVME_CMD_EFFECTS_CSUPP into account while
returning effects. It should be removed from there, and we need nothing
else here.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-15 8:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-14 16:13 only allow unprivileged passthrough for commands without effects v2 Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-14 16:13 ` [PATCH 1/9] nvmet: use NVME_CMD_EFFECTS_CSUPP instead of open coding it Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-14 16:13 ` [PATCH 2/9] nvmet: set the LBCC bit for commands that modify data Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-14 16:13 ` [PATCH 3/9] nvme: remove nvme_execute_passthru_rq Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-14 16:13 ` [PATCH 4/9] nvmet: refactor passthru fixup code Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-14 16:13 ` [PATCH 5/9] nvmet: allow async passthrough of commands that change logical block contents Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-14 16:13 ` [PATCH 6/9] nvme: only return actual effects from nvme_command_effects Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-14 16:13 ` [PATCH 7/9] nvme: assign known effects at controller initialization time Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-14 16:34 ` Keith Busch
2022-12-15 13:15 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-12-14 16:13 ` [PATCH 8/9] nvme: also return I/O command effects from nvme_command_effects Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-14 16:13 ` [PATCH 9/9] nvme: don't allow unprivileged passthrough of commands that have effects Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-15 7:14 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-12-15 8:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-15 8:24 ` Kanchan Joshi [this message]
2022-12-15 8:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-14 16:36 ` only allow unprivileged passthrough for commands without effects v2 Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221215082410.GB27656@test-zns \
--to=joshi.k@samsung.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox