public inbox for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] nvme: assign known effects at controller initialization time
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 18:45:31 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221215131531.GA8002@test-zns> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221214161347.764071-8-hch@lst.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 642 bytes --]

On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 05:13:45PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

>+static int nvme_init_effects(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, struct nvme_id_ctrl *id)
>+{
>+	int ret;
>+
>+	if (id->lpa & NVME_CTRL_LPA_CMD_EFFECTS_LOG) {
>+		ret = nvme_get_effects_log(ctrl, NVME_CSI_NVM, &ctrl->effects);
>+		if (ret < 0)
>+			return ret;
>+	} else {
>+		ctrl->effects = kzalloc(sizeof(*ctrl->effects), GFP_KERNEL);
>+		if (!ctrl->effects)
>+			return -ENOMEM;

Maybe I am missing something obvious, but when ctrl->effects gets
freed if it was allocated via the else path above?
It's not going to that "ctrl->cels" xarray which gets freed during
nvme_free_ctrl.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]



  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-12-15 13:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-14 16:13 only allow unprivileged passthrough for commands without effects v2 Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-14 16:13 ` [PATCH 1/9] nvmet: use NVME_CMD_EFFECTS_CSUPP instead of open coding it Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-14 16:13 ` [PATCH 2/9] nvmet: set the LBCC bit for commands that modify data Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-14 16:13 ` [PATCH 3/9] nvme: remove nvme_execute_passthru_rq Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-14 16:13 ` [PATCH 4/9] nvmet: refactor passthru fixup code Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-14 16:13 ` [PATCH 5/9] nvmet: allow async passthrough of commands that change logical block contents Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-14 16:13 ` [PATCH 6/9] nvme: only return actual effects from nvme_command_effects Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-14 16:13 ` [PATCH 7/9] nvme: assign known effects at controller initialization time Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-14 16:34   ` Keith Busch
2022-12-15 13:15   ` Kanchan Joshi [this message]
2022-12-14 16:13 ` [PATCH 8/9] nvme: also return I/O command effects from nvme_command_effects Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-14 16:13 ` [PATCH 9/9] nvme: don't allow unprivileged passthrough of commands that have effects Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-15  7:14   ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-12-15  8:18     ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-15  8:24       ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-12-15  8:37         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-12-14 16:36 ` only allow unprivileged passthrough for commands without effects v2 Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221215131531.GA8002@test-zns \
    --to=joshi.k@samsung.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox