From: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
To: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>
Cc: "lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org >> linux-fsdevel"
<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Bart Van Assche" <bvanassche@acm.org>,
"josef@toxicpanda.com" <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
"Amir Goldstein" <amir73il@gmail.com>,
"Javier González" <javier@javigon.com>,
"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
"Keith Busch" <kbusch@kernel.org>,
"Hannes Reinecke" <hare@suse.de>,
"Damien Le Moal" <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>,
"Johannes Thumshirn" <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>,
"jack@suse.com" <jack@suse.com>, "Ming Lei" <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
"Sagi Grimberg" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
"snitzer@kernel.org" <snitzer@kernel.org>,
"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF ATTEND][LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] : blktests: status, an expansion plan for the storage stack test framework
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 02:20:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230119022056.plpe5wejji6gl3fp@shindev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e24383ca-8ba8-3eb3-776c-047aba58173d@nvidia.com>
CC+: Mike, dm-devel,
Hi Chaitanya, thanks for bringing this up! I definitely want to join and learn
from the discussions. Here I note my comments about them.
On Jan 18, 2023 / 23:52, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
[...]
> For storage track, I would like to propose a session dedicated to
> blktests. It is a great opportunity for the storage developers to gather
> and have a discussion about:-
>
> 1. Current status of the blktests framework.
In the session, I can talk shortly about recent blktests improvements and
failure cases.
> 2. Any new/missing features that we want to add in the blktests.
A feature I wish is to mark dangerous test cases which cause system crash, in
similar way as fstests does. I think they should be skipped by default not to
confuse new blktests users.
I remember that dmesg logging was discussed at the last LSFMMBPF, but it is not
yet implemented. It may worth revisit.
> 3. Any new kernel features that could be used to make testing easier?
> 4. DM/MD Testcases.
I took a liberty to add Mike and dm-devel to CC. Recently, a patch was posted to
add 'dm' test category [1]. I hope it will help DM/MD developers to add more
tests in the category. I would like to discuss if it is a good start, or if
anything is missing in blktests to support DM/MD testing.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20221230065424.19998-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com/#t
>
> E.g. Implementing new features in the null_blk.c in order to have device
> independent complete test coverage. (e.g. adding discard command for
> null_blk or any other specific REQ_OP). Discussion about having any new
> tracepoint events in the block layer.
>
> 4. Any new test cases/categories which are lacking in the blktests
> framework.
One thing in my mind is character device. From recent discussions [2][3], it
looks worth adding some basic test cases for NVME character devices and SG
devices.
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20221221103441.3216600-1-mcgrof@kernel.org/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/Y77J%2Fw0gf2nIDMd%2F@x1-carbon/
--
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-19 2:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-18 23:52 [LSF/MM/BPF ATTEND][LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] : blktests: status, an expansion plan for the storage stack test framework Chaitanya Kulkarni
2023-01-19 2:20 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki [this message]
2023-01-23 0:59 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230119022056.plpe5wejji6gl3fp@shindev \
--to=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
--cc=Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=javier@javigon.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox