public inbox for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
To: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>
Cc: "lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org >> linux-fsdevel"
	<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"Bart Van Assche" <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	"josef@toxicpanda.com" <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	"Amir Goldstein" <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	"Javier González" <javier@javigon.com>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
	"Keith Busch" <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	"Hannes Reinecke" <hare@suse.de>,
	"Damien Le Moal" <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>,
	"Johannes Thumshirn" <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>,
	"jack@suse.com" <jack@suse.com>, "Ming Lei" <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	"Sagi Grimberg" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	"snitzer@kernel.org" <snitzer@kernel.org>,
	"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF ATTEND][LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] : blktests: status, an expansion plan for the storage stack test framework
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 02:20:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230119022056.plpe5wejji6gl3fp@shindev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e24383ca-8ba8-3eb3-776c-047aba58173d@nvidia.com>

CC+: Mike, dm-devel,

Hi Chaitanya, thanks for bringing this up! I definitely want to join and learn
from the discussions. Here I note my comments about them.

On Jan 18, 2023 / 23:52, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
[...]
> For storage track, I would like to propose a session dedicated to
> blktests. It is a great opportunity for the storage developers to gather
> and have a discussion about:-
> 
> 1. Current status of the blktests framework.

In the session, I can talk shortly about recent blktests improvements and
failure cases.

> 2. Any new/missing features that we want to add in the blktests.

A feature I wish is to mark dangerous test cases which cause system crash, in
similar way as fstests does. I think they should be skipped by default not to
confuse new blktests users.

I remember that dmesg logging was discussed at the last LSFMMBPF, but it is not
yet implemented. It may worth revisit.

> 3. Any new kernel features that could be used to make testing easier?
> 4. DM/MD Testcases.

I took a liberty to add Mike and dm-devel to CC. Recently, a patch was posted to
add 'dm' test category [1]. I hope it will help DM/MD developers to add more
tests in the category. I would like to discuss if it is a good start, or if
anything is missing in blktests to support DM/MD testing.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20221230065424.19998-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com/#t

> 
> E.g. Implementing new features in the null_blk.c in order to have device
> independent complete test coverage. (e.g. adding discard command for
> null_blk or any other specific REQ_OP). Discussion about having any new
> tracepoint events in the block layer.
> 
> 4. Any new test cases/categories which are lacking in the blktests
> framework.

One thing in my mind is character device. From recent discussions [2][3], it
looks worth adding some basic test cases for NVME character devices and SG
devices.

[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-block/20221221103441.3216600-1-mcgrof@kernel.org/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/Y77J%2Fw0gf2nIDMd%2F@x1-carbon/

-- 
Shin'ichiro Kawasaki

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-19  2:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-18 23:52 [LSF/MM/BPF ATTEND][LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] : blktests: status, an expansion plan for the storage stack test framework Chaitanya Kulkarni
2023-01-19  2:20 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki [this message]
2023-01-23  0:59   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230119022056.plpe5wejji6gl3fp@shindev \
    --to=shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=javier@javigon.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox