From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, sagi@grimberg.me,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] nvme: add polling options for loop target
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 14:52:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230322135200.GA16587@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230322084651.xmnup2ag3ve6jr3a@carbon.lan>
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 09:46:51AM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> The blktest I have written for this problem fails for loop without something
> like this. We can certaintanly teach blktests not run a specific test for loop
> but currently, the _require_nvme_trtype_is_fabrics check is including loop.
Who says that we could support polling on all current and future
fabrics transports?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-22 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-22 0:23 [PATCH 0/3] nvme fabrics polling fixes Keith Busch
2023-03-22 0:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] nvme-fabrics: add queue setup helpers Keith Busch
2023-03-22 1:46 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2023-03-22 4:38 ` kernel test robot
2023-03-22 5:21 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2023-03-22 7:35 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-03-22 8:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-22 9:07 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-03-22 9:25 ` kernel test robot
2023-03-22 0:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] nvme: add polling options for loop target Keith Busch
2023-03-22 1:47 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2023-03-22 7:44 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-03-22 8:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-22 8:46 ` Daniel Wagner
2023-03-22 13:52 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2023-03-22 14:06 ` Daniel Wagner
2023-03-22 14:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-22 14:30 ` Keith Busch
2023-03-22 0:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] blk-mq: directly poll requests Keith Busch
2023-03-22 7:36 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-03-22 8:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-22 9:08 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-03-22 8:37 ` Daniel Wagner
2023-03-22 18:16 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2023-03-31 7:57 ` Shinichiro Kawasaki
2023-03-22 7:31 ` [PATCH 0/3] nvme fabrics polling fixes Sagi Grimberg
2023-03-22 8:48 ` Daniel Wagner
2023-03-22 13:24 ` Sagi Grimberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230322135200.GA16587@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kbusch@meta.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox