public inbox for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
To: Costa Sapuntzakis <costa@purestorage.com>,
	Randy Jennings <randyj@purestorage.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Cc: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] nvme: improve handling of long keep alives
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 16:55:58 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230417225558.2890062-4-ushankar@purestorage.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230417225558.2890062-1-ushankar@purestorage.com>

Upon keep alive completion, nvme_keep_alive_work is scheduled with the
same delay every time. If keep alive commands are completing slowly,
this may cause a keep alive timeout. The following trace illustrates the
issue, taking KATO = 8 and TBKAS off for simplicity:

1. t = 0: run nvme_keep_alive_work, send keep alive
2. t = ε: keep alive reaches controller, controller restarts its keep
          alive timer
3. t = 4: host receives keep alive completion, schedules
          nvme_keep_alive_work with delay 4
4. t = 8: run nvme_keep_alive_work, send keep alive

Here, a keep alive having RTT of 4 causes a delay of at least 8 - ε
between the controller receiving successive keep alives. With ε small,
the controller is likely to detect a keep alive timeout.

Fix this by calculating the RTT of the keep alive command, and adjusting
the scheduling delay of the next keep alive work accordingly.

Reported-by: Costa Sapuntzakis <costa@purestorage.com>
Reported-by: Randy Jennings <randyj@purestorage.com>
Signed-off-by: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
---
 drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index 8a63051d7b5e..fbb8b2f41fe4 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -1162,10 +1162,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(nvme_passthru_end, NVME_TARGET_PASSTHRU);
  * frequency, as one command completion can postpone sending a keep alive
  * command by up to twice the delay between runs.
  */
+static unsigned long nvme_keep_alive_work_period(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
+{
+	return (ctrl->ctratt & NVME_CTRL_ATTR_TBKAS) ?
+		(ctrl->kato * HZ / 4) : (ctrl->kato * HZ / 2);
+}
+
 static void nvme_queue_keep_alive_work(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
 {
-	unsigned long delay = (ctrl->ctratt & NVME_CTRL_ATTR_TBKAS) ?
-		ctrl->kato * HZ / 4 : ctrl->kato * HZ / 2;
+	unsigned long delay = nvme_keep_alive_work_period(ctrl);
 	queue_delayed_work(nvme_wq, &ctrl->ka_work, delay);
 }
 
@@ -1175,6 +1180,15 @@ static enum rq_end_io_ret nvme_keep_alive_end_io(struct request *rq,
 	struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl = rq->end_io_data;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	bool startka = false;
+	unsigned long rtt = jiffies - nvme_req(rq)->start_time;
+	unsigned long delay = nvme_keep_alive_work_period(ctrl);
+
+	/* Subtract off the keepalive RTT so nvme_keep_alive_work runs
+	 * at the desired frequency. */
+	if (rtt <= delay)
+		delay -= rtt;
+	else
+		delay = 0;
 
 	blk_mq_free_request(rq);
 
@@ -1194,7 +1208,7 @@ static enum rq_end_io_ret nvme_keep_alive_end_io(struct request *rq,
 		startka = true;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctrl->lock, flags);
 	if (startka)
-		nvme_queue_keep_alive_work(ctrl);
+		queue_delayed_work(nvme_wq, &ctrl->ka_work, delay);
 	return RQ_END_IO_NONE;
 }
 
-- 
2.25.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-17 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-17 22:55 [PATCH 0/3] keepalive bugfixes Uday Shankar
2023-04-17 22:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] nvme: double KA polling frequency to avoid KATO with TBKAS on Uday Shankar
2023-04-18 16:03   ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-18 16:48     ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 22:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] nvme: check IO start time when deciding to defer KA Uday Shankar
2023-04-18 16:56   ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-20 19:37     ` Uday Shankar
2023-04-17 22:55 ` Uday Shankar [this message]
2023-04-18 16:59   ` [PATCH 3/3] nvme: improve handling of long keep alives Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-20 19:34     ` Uday Shankar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230417225558.2890062-4-ushankar@purestorage.com \
    --to=ushankar@purestorage.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=costa@purestorage.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=randyj@purestorage.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox