From: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
To: Costa Sapuntzakis <costa@purestorage.com>,
Randy Jennings <randyj@purestorage.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Cc: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] nvme: improve handling of long keep alives
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 16:55:58 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230417225558.2890062-4-ushankar@purestorage.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230417225558.2890062-1-ushankar@purestorage.com>
Upon keep alive completion, nvme_keep_alive_work is scheduled with the
same delay every time. If keep alive commands are completing slowly,
this may cause a keep alive timeout. The following trace illustrates the
issue, taking KATO = 8 and TBKAS off for simplicity:
1. t = 0: run nvme_keep_alive_work, send keep alive
2. t = ε: keep alive reaches controller, controller restarts its keep
alive timer
3. t = 4: host receives keep alive completion, schedules
nvme_keep_alive_work with delay 4
4. t = 8: run nvme_keep_alive_work, send keep alive
Here, a keep alive having RTT of 4 causes a delay of at least 8 - ε
between the controller receiving successive keep alives. With ε small,
the controller is likely to detect a keep alive timeout.
Fix this by calculating the RTT of the keep alive command, and adjusting
the scheduling delay of the next keep alive work accordingly.
Reported-by: Costa Sapuntzakis <costa@purestorage.com>
Reported-by: Randy Jennings <randyj@purestorage.com>
Signed-off-by: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
---
drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index 8a63051d7b5e..fbb8b2f41fe4 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -1162,10 +1162,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(nvme_passthru_end, NVME_TARGET_PASSTHRU);
* frequency, as one command completion can postpone sending a keep alive
* command by up to twice the delay between runs.
*/
+static unsigned long nvme_keep_alive_work_period(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
+{
+ return (ctrl->ctratt & NVME_CTRL_ATTR_TBKAS) ?
+ (ctrl->kato * HZ / 4) : (ctrl->kato * HZ / 2);
+}
+
static void nvme_queue_keep_alive_work(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
{
- unsigned long delay = (ctrl->ctratt & NVME_CTRL_ATTR_TBKAS) ?
- ctrl->kato * HZ / 4 : ctrl->kato * HZ / 2;
+ unsigned long delay = nvme_keep_alive_work_period(ctrl);
queue_delayed_work(nvme_wq, &ctrl->ka_work, delay);
}
@@ -1175,6 +1180,15 @@ static enum rq_end_io_ret nvme_keep_alive_end_io(struct request *rq,
struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl = rq->end_io_data;
unsigned long flags;
bool startka = false;
+ unsigned long rtt = jiffies - nvme_req(rq)->start_time;
+ unsigned long delay = nvme_keep_alive_work_period(ctrl);
+
+ /* Subtract off the keepalive RTT so nvme_keep_alive_work runs
+ * at the desired frequency. */
+ if (rtt <= delay)
+ delay -= rtt;
+ else
+ delay = 0;
blk_mq_free_request(rq);
@@ -1194,7 +1208,7 @@ static enum rq_end_io_ret nvme_keep_alive_end_io(struct request *rq,
startka = true;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctrl->lock, flags);
if (startka)
- nvme_queue_keep_alive_work(ctrl);
+ queue_delayed_work(nvme_wq, &ctrl->ka_work, delay);
return RQ_END_IO_NONE;
}
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-17 22:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-17 22:55 [PATCH 0/3] keepalive bugfixes Uday Shankar
2023-04-17 22:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] nvme: double KA polling frequency to avoid KATO with TBKAS on Uday Shankar
2023-04-18 16:03 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-18 16:48 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 22:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] nvme: check IO start time when deciding to defer KA Uday Shankar
2023-04-18 16:56 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-20 19:37 ` Uday Shankar
2023-04-17 22:55 ` Uday Shankar [this message]
2023-04-18 16:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] nvme: improve handling of long keep alives Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-20 19:34 ` Uday Shankar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230417225558.2890062-4-ushankar@purestorage.com \
--to=ushankar@purestorage.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=costa@purestorage.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=randyj@purestorage.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox