From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev,
Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/18] nvme-tcp: do not set MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 11:21:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230418112139.546aff79@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f02fb607-1339-2c68-4bd5-ced65d71b822@suse.de>
On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 12:33:03 +0200 Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Ah-ha. Found it.
>
> Turns out to be an arguably invalid control flow on our side.
>
> The initial 'connect' command is a command PDU with inline data.
> So in our (current) flow we do a 'sendpage()' with the
> MORE/SENDPAGE_NOTLAST flag set as we have to transfer more data.
> Ok so far.
> But for transmitting the actual data we evaluate 'sendpage_ok()', which
> returns _false_. And then we continue to call 'sendmsg()' for the inline
> data.
> This confuses the TLS software stack as sendpage() and sendmsg() are two
> distinct code paths, and we end up with a TX stall.
>
> Solution: check 'sendpage_ok()' when we have inline data and use
> 'sendmsg' for the command pdu if required.
>
> It always pays to dig deeper if one's not exactly sure what's happening ...
>
> Will be updating the patchset.
Hm, yeah, sendpage(NOT_LAST)+sendmsg() could indeed be buggy/untested.
It wasn't something we could have tested from user space, we'd need
kunit or some such :(
Adding it the backlog. And adding Vadim to CC in case he has cycles
to take a look.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-18 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-17 13:02 [PATCHv3 00/18] nvme: In-kernel TLS support for TCP Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 01/18] nvme-keyring: register '.nvme' keyring Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 02/18] nvme-keyring: define a 'psk' keytype Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 03/18] nvme: add TCP TSAS definitions Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 04/18] nvme-tcp: add definitions for TLS cipher suites Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 05/18] nvme-keyring: implement nvme_tls_psk_default() Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 06/18] net/tls: implement ->read_sock() Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 15:14 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 07/18] net/tls: sanitize MSG_EOR handling Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 15:19 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-17 20:10 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-04-18 10:07 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-18 10:24 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-18 10:39 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-18 10:43 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-18 11:02 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-18 18:28 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 08/18] nvme-tcp: do not set MSG_SENDPAGE_NOTLAST Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 15:10 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-17 15:25 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 15:28 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-17 15:35 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 20:16 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-04-18 10:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-18 18:21 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-04-18 18:25 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 09/18] security/keys: export key_lookup() Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 10/18] nvme/tcp: allocate socket file Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 11/18] nvme-tcp: enable TLS handshake upcall Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 15:26 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-17 15:28 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 15:31 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-17 15:36 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-18 5:52 ` Daniel Wagner
2023-04-18 9:38 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-18 10:12 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-18 10:28 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-18 10:32 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-18 10:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 12/18] nvme-tcp: control message handling for recvmsg() Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 15:24 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-17 15:26 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 13/18] nvme-fabrics: parse options 'keyring' and 'tls_key' Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 14/18] nvmet: make TCP sectype settable via configfs Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:02 ` [PATCH 15/18] nvmet-tcp: allocate socket file Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 15:29 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-04-17 13:03 ` [PATCH 16/18] nvmet-tcp: enable TLS handshake upcall Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:03 ` [PATCH 17/18] nvmet-tcp: control messages for recvmsg() Hannes Reinecke
2023-04-17 13:03 ` [PATCH 18/18] nvmet-tcp: add configfs attribute 'param_keyring' Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230418112139.546aff79@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).