From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] net/tls: handle MSG_EOR for tls_sw TX flow
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 13:38:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230719113836.68859-2-hare@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230719113836.68859-1-hare@suse.de>
tls_sw_sendmsg() already handles MSG_MORE, but bails
out on MSG_EOR.
Seeing that MSG_EOR is basically the opposite of
MSG_MORE this patch adds handling MSG_EOR by treating
it as the negation of MSG_MORE.
And erroring out if MSG_EOR is specified with MSG_MORE.
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
---
net/tls/tls_sw.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index 53f944e6d8ef..9aef45e870a5 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -984,6 +984,9 @@ static int tls_sw_sendmsg_locked(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
int ret = 0;
int pending;
+ if (!eor && (msg->msg_flags & MSG_EOR))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
if (unlikely(msg->msg_controllen)) {
ret = tls_process_cmsg(sk, msg, &record_type);
if (ret) {
@@ -1193,7 +1196,7 @@ int tls_sw_sendmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, size_t size)
int ret;
if (msg->msg_flags & ~(MSG_MORE | MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_NOSIGNAL |
- MSG_CMSG_COMPAT | MSG_SPLICE_PAGES |
+ MSG_CMSG_COMPAT | MSG_SPLICE_PAGES | MSG_EOR |
MSG_SENDPAGE_NOPOLICY))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
--
2.35.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-19 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-19 11:38 [RESENT PATCHv7 0/6] net/tls: fixes for NVMe-over-TLS Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-19 11:38 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2023-07-19 11:38 ` [PATCH 2/6] net/tls: handle MSG_EOR for tls_device TX flow Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-19 11:38 ` [PATCH 3/6] selftests/net/tls: add test for MSG_EOR Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-19 11:38 ` [PATCH 4/6] net/tls: Use tcp_read_sock() instead of ops->read_sock() Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-19 11:54 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-07-19 11:38 ` [PATCH 5/6] net/tls: split tls_rx_reader_lock Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-19 11:55 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-07-19 11:38 ` [PATCH 6/6] net/tls: implement ->read_sock() Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-19 11:55 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-07-20 18:32 ` Simon Horman
2023-07-21 6:03 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-21 3:02 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-21 13:53 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-21 14:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-07-26 19:15 [PATCHv9 0/6] net/tls: fixes for NVMe-over-TLS Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-26 19:15 ` [PATCH 1/6] net/tls: handle MSG_EOR for tls_sw TX flow Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-21 14:35 [PATCHv8 0/6] net/tls: fixes for NVMe-over-TLS Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-21 14:35 ` [PATCH 1/6] net/tls: handle MSG_EOR for tls_sw TX flow Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-19 11:19 [PATCHv7 0/6] net/tls: fixes for NVMe-over-TLS Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-19 11:19 ` [PATCH 1/6] net/tls: handle MSG_EOR for tls_sw TX flow Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230719113836.68859-2-hare@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).