From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 0/6] net/tls: fixes for NVMe-over-TLS
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 12:35:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230724123546.70775e77@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9f37941c-b265-7f28-ebec-76c04804b684@grimberg.me>
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 10:21:52 +0300 Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> >> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> >>
> >> Sagi, I _think_ a stable branch with this should be doable,
> >> would you like one, or no rush?
> >
> > I guess a stable branch would not be too bad; I've got another
> > set of patches for the NVMe side, too.
> > Sagi?
>
> I don't think there is a real need for this to go to stable, nothing
> is using it. Perhaps the MSG_EOR patches can go to stable in case
> there is some userspace code that wants to rely on it.
I'm probably using the wrong word. I mean a branch based on -rc3 that's
not going to get rebased so the commits IDs match and we can both pull
it in. Not stable as in Greg KH.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-24 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-21 14:35 [PATCHv8 0/6] net/tls: fixes for NVMe-over-TLS Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-21 14:35 ` [PATCH 1/6] net/tls: handle MSG_EOR for tls_sw TX flow Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-21 14:35 ` [PATCH 2/6] net/tls: handle MSG_EOR for tls_device " Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-21 14:35 ` [PATCH 3/6] selftests/net/tls: add test for MSG_EOR Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-21 14:35 ` [PATCH 4/6] net/tls: Use tcp_read_sock() instead of ops->read_sock() Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-21 14:35 ` [PATCH 5/6] net/tls: split tls_rx_reader_lock Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-21 14:35 ` [PATCH 6/6] net/tls: implement ->read_sock() Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-24 12:59 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-07-24 13:47 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-22 2:00 ` [PATCHv8 0/6] net/tls: fixes for NVMe-over-TLS Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-24 7:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2023-07-24 7:21 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-07-24 19:35 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-07-24 19:44 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-07-24 19:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-25 6:55 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230724123546.70775e77@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).