From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>, Jeremy Allison <jallison@ciq.com>,
tansuresh@google.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
rafael@kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] driver core: Support two-pass driver shutdown
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 12:15:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240105181517.GA1861750@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240105042955.GC23630@lst.de>
On Fri, Jan 05, 2024 at 05:29:55AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 10:07:30AM -0800, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> >> But I'm not a workqueue expert and I do see the scary warning at
> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/linux/workqueue.h?id=v6.6#n619,
> >> about not flushing system-wide workqueues, so maybe this wouldn't be
> >> workable.
> >
> > This is a bigger change than I'm comfortable with
> > (or indeed understand :-) right now. Can we fix
> > the immediate problem first please and then look
> > for improvements later ?
>
> It's also a lot less efficient. Assuming NVMe isn't alone and other
> hardware interfaces also have a shutdown/disable busy wait (and I've seen
> quite a few that do) as their limiting factor the two-pass shutdown seems
> much nicer than spawning tons of work items.
Here's the essence of the two-pass proposal, adding .shutdown_wait():
device_shutdown
for_each_device
dev->bus->shutdown()
...
nvme_shutdown
nvme_disable_prepare_reset
nvme_dev_disable
nvme_disable_ctrl
+ case NVME_DISABLE_SHUTDOWN_ASYNC:
+ return;
+ case NVME_DISABLE_SHUTDOWN_SYNC:
nvme_wait_ready(...);
+ if (dev->bus->shutdown_wait)
+ list_add(&shutdown_wait_list)
+
+ for_each(&shutdown_wait_list)
+ dev->bus->shutdown_wait()
+ pci_device_shutdown_wait
+ nvme_shutdown_wait
+ nvme_wait_ready(...)
FWIW, what I imagined was something like this, where we don't add
.shutdown_wait(), but any .shutdown() method could become asynchronous
by queuing a work item to do the wait:
+ nvme_wait_ready_work
+ nvme_wait_ready(...)
device_shutdown
+ async_shutdown_wq = create_workqueue("async_shutdown");
for_each_device
dev->bus->shutdown()
...
nvme_shutdown
nvme_disable_prepare_reset
nvme_dev_disable
nvme_disable_ctrl
+ case NVME_DISABLE_SHUTDOWN_ASYNC:
+ queue_work(async_shutdown_wq, &nvme_wait_ready_work)
+ return;
+ case NVME_DISABLE_SHUTDOWN_SYNC:
nvme_wait_ready(...);
+
+ destroy_workqueue(async_shutdown_wq);
This is a bit of hand waving because I'm not a workqueue expert, but
it seems like basically the same amount of overhead without having to
add .shutdown_wait() to the bus_type and the pci_driver.
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-05 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-21 17:22 Make NVME shutdown two-pass - Version 3 Jeremy Allison
2023-12-21 17:22 ` [PATCH 1/4] driver core: Support two-pass driver shutdown Jeremy Allison
2023-12-21 17:29 ` Greg KH
2023-12-27 20:33 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-01-01 9:23 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-01-02 23:12 ` Jeremy Allison
2024-01-05 4:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-02 18:07 ` Jeremy Allison
2024-01-05 4:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-01-05 18:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2024-01-08 8:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-21 17:22 ` [PATCH 2/4] PCI: Support two-pass shutdown Jeremy Allison
2023-12-21 17:22 ` [PATCH 3/4] Change 'bool shutdown' into an enum shutdown_type { NVME_DISABLE_RESET = 0, NVME_DISABLE_SHUTDOWN_SYNC = 1 } Jeremy Allison
2023-12-27 19:33 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-01-02 18:06 ` Jeremy Allison
2023-12-21 17:22 ` [PATCH 4/4] nvme: Add two-pass shutdown support Jeremy Allison
2023-12-25 9:58 ` Sagi Grimberg
2023-12-27 0:53 ` Jeremy Allison
2024-01-01 9:21 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-01-02 18:03 ` Jeremy Allison
2024-01-03 8:36 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-01-03 17:41 ` Jeremy Allison
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240105181517.GA1861750@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jallison@ciq.com \
--cc=jra@samba.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=tansuresh@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox