From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F11E4C04FFE for ; Wed, 15 May 2024 01:04:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=UncqaiqRnH41dkksS9nEGqwLU7b5ZxM52J4pdhjrMQ0=; b=FcF6Dwt/KLY3B8gxT7ONQu0qIs kKcACwe5ubN+GviNBnRLiNtv/sZvJjyOnJR1yDdrFYTw78c3LrE/V4Mg9u/cRyxZpCLpFL94+qAb7 oUl5ccvHvwPS5hT7Id57k6hlaD9Q383lqf6krq2jP9nCROM2hGjhi89dJZ2awdU4t7fYwtTv2HS+M eV+QTMvhjyc9QfyogdqQ6XtXCE4lCFBT+SwMEFKyNYIPLx879sDBefserUT/jiDMGmE+KVEgnvgFm BxfFiZHuVxDmYfl7vVlCtjr2YMmeJzu3EtzpDruI6QP2ztb+EWmEJEQ7+Q6T3JOH6YMExXQh1JJj3 9DU3zROg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s7343-000000001VI-19VW; Wed, 15 May 2024 01:04:15 +0000 Received: from mgamail.intel.com ([192.198.163.19]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1s7340-000000001Tm-3fXY for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 15 May 2024 01:04:14 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1715735053; x=1747271053; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=JR0EyROUPsAs/gj4aRFKaKKp/XxKJGSvUQck05tirXY=; b=HXq+V5a+i3d+IbA22GPW+4gALJeS/j7WPWZ5ey0V0enaaIiWhM9oxw6a 1CFEw6jL++/JSaUMRSUKDXf2tQJCm09s+xpL8XI9r2O9dRnZ0am5lrgN9 cFOunT2V8Hob77jQLQUqu4xPljvzjiyRw+V47pmiHp06/EO/5MubSclBO VflK+xYXcoStElZBKdX1O7jUwg4/PEXef5nbbWXYPqQQJGdynlMFLRPNc 2ILHdKp7yNHdk+CjHfGXbDOnhEobtz3+KqQYtm7zPsXB+whVs2ydozKXa N2LLa68hXxQoP2U3P//VVygnSVzYJ/QmBDbHj7qi4a9ARZ9o47nMMp3f8 w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: +S+Vu5nCQfaKkNN6sOyGoA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: YoPNkoAiTeOrV32d1YEAeQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11073"; a="11614518" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,160,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="11614518" Received: from fmviesa006.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.146]) by fmvoesa113.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 May 2024 18:04:11 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: SdpTbBksTFazk3jzjJepSA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Drlff/oITP2CaBqvcdteBw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.08,160,1712646000"; d="scan'208";a="30943297" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO f8b243fe6e68) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 May 2024 18:04:08 -0700 Received: from kbuild by f8b243fe6e68 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1s733u-000CBL-1S; Wed, 15 May 2024 01:04:06 +0000 Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 09:03:41 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Hannes Reinecke , Jens Axboe Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Matthew Wilcox , Luis Chamberlain , Pankaj Raghav , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Hannes Reinecke Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] block/bdev: lift restrictions on supported blocksize Message-ID: <202405150852.LoiNtqk4-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240514173900.62207-6-hare@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240514173900.62207-6-hare@kernel.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240514_180412_954738_A3B45300 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.16 ) X-BeenThere: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-nvme" Errors-To: linux-nvme-bounces+linux-nvme=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Hannes, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on axboe-block/for-next] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.9] [cannot apply to next-20240514] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Hannes-Reinecke/fs-mpage-avoid-negative-shift-for-large-blocksize/20240515-014146 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240514173900.62207-6-hare%40kernel.org patch subject: [PATCH 5/6] block/bdev: lift restrictions on supported blocksize config: s390-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240515/202405150852.LoiNtqk4-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 19.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project b910bebc300dafb30569cecc3017b446ea8eafa0) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240515/202405150852.LoiNtqk4-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405150852.LoiNtqk4-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from block/bdev.c:9: In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2210: include/linux/vmstat.h:522:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 522 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_" | ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~ In file included from block/bdev.c:15: In file included from include/linux/blk-integrity.h:5: In file included from include/linux/blk-mq.h:8: In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:78: include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 547 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 560 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu' 37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x)) | ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16' 102 | #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x)) | ^ In file included from block/bdev.c:15: In file included from include/linux/blk-integrity.h:5: In file included from include/linux/blk-mq.h:8: In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:78: include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 573 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu' 35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x)) | ^ include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32' 115 | #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x)) | ^ In file included from block/bdev.c:15: In file included from include/linux/blk-integrity.h:5: In file included from include/linux/blk-mq.h:8: In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9: In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:78: include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 584 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 594 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 604 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:692:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 692 | readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:700:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 700 | readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:708:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 708 | readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:717:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 717 | writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:726:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 726 | writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:735:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 735 | writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ block/bdev.c:145:2: error: call to undeclared function 'mapping_set_folio_min_order'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 145 | mapping_set_folio_min_order(bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping, | ^ >> block/bdev.c:152:16: error: use of undeclared identifier 'bs' 152 | if (get_order(bs) > MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER || size < 512 || | ^ block/bdev.c:164:3: error: call to undeclared function 'mapping_set_folio_min_order'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 164 | mapping_set_folio_min_order(bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping, | ^ 13 warnings and 3 errors generated. vim +/bs +152 block/bdev.c 148 149 int set_blocksize(struct block_device *bdev, int size) 150 { 151 /* Size must be a power of two, and between 512 and MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER*/ > 152 if (get_order(bs) > MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER || size < 512 || 153 !is_power_of_2(size)) 154 return -EINVAL; 155 156 /* Size cannot be smaller than the size supported by the device */ 157 if (size < bdev_logical_block_size(bdev)) 158 return -EINVAL; 159 160 /* Don't change the size if it is same as current */ 161 if (bdev->bd_inode->i_blkbits != blksize_bits(size)) { 162 sync_blockdev(bdev); 163 bdev->bd_inode->i_blkbits = blksize_bits(size); 164 mapping_set_folio_min_order(bdev->bd_inode->i_mapping, 165 get_order(size)); 166 kill_bdev(bdev); 167 } 168 return 0; 169 } 170 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki