Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Cc: hch@lst.de, kbusch@kernel.org, sagi@grimberg.me,
	gjoyce@linux.ibm.com, axboe@fb.com,
	Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] nvme-multipath: find NUMA path only for online numa-node
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 17:43:51 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240516121358.3145962-1-nilay@linux.ibm.com> (raw)

In current native multipath design when a shared namespace is created,
we loop through each possible numa-node, calculate the NUMA distance of
that node from each nvme controller and then cache the optimal IO path
for future reference while sending IO. The issue with this design is that
we may refer to the NUMA distance table for an offline node which may not
be populated at the time and so we may inadvertently end up finding and
caching a non-optimal path for IO. Then latter when the corresponding
numa-node becomes online and hence the NUMA distance table entry for that
node is created, ideally we should re-calculate the multipath node distance
for the newly added node however that doesn't happen unless we rescan/reset
the controller. So essentially, we may keep using non-optimal IO path for a
node which is made online after namespace is created.
This patch helps fix this issue ensuring that when a shared namespace is
created, we calculate the multipath node distance for each online numa-node
instead of each possible numa-node. Then latter when a node becomes online
and we receive any IO on that newly added node, we would calculate the
multipath node distance for newly added node but this time NUMA distance
table would have been already populated for newly added node. Hence we
would be able to correctly calculate the multipath node distance and choose
the optimal path for the IO.

Signed-off-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c b/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c
index d16e976ae1a4..9c1e135b8df3 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c
@@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static void nvme_mpath_set_live(struct nvme_ns *ns)
 		int node, srcu_idx;
 
 		srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(&head->srcu);
-		for_each_node(node)
+		for_each_online_node(node)
 			__nvme_find_path(head, node);
 		srcu_read_unlock(&head->srcu, srcu_idx);
 	}
-- 
2.44.0



             reply	other threads:[~2024-05-16 12:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-16 12:13 Nilay Shroff [this message]
2024-05-20 12:42 ` [PATCH] nvme-multipath: find NUMA path only for online numa-node Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-21 13:47 ` Keith Busch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240516121358.3145962-1-nilay@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=gjoyce@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox