From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbecker@suse.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Sridhar Balaraman <sbalaraman@parallelwireless.com>,
"brookxu.cn" <brookxu.cn@gmail.com>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] nvme-pci: limit queue count to housekeeping cpus
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 07:14:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240622051420.GC11303@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240621-isolcpus-io-queues-v1-2-8b169bf41083@suse.de>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c b/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c
> index 9638b25fd521..43c039900ef6 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c
> @@ -11,10 +11,23 @@
> #include <linux/smp.h>
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> #include <linux/group_cpus.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/isolation.h>
>
> #include "blk.h"
> #include "blk-mq.h"
>
> +unsigned int blk_mq_num_possible_queues(void)
> +{
> + const struct cpumask *io_queue_mask;
> +
> + io_queue_mask = housekeeping_cpumask(HK_TYPE_IO_QUEUE);
> + if (!cpumask_empty(io_queue_mask))
> + return cpumask_weight(io_queue_mask);
> +
> + return num_possible_cpus();
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_num_possible_queues);
This should be split into a separate patch. And it could really use
a kerneldoc comment.
> - return num_possible_cpus() + dev->nr_write_queues + dev->nr_poll_queues;
> + return blk_mq_num_possible_queues() + dev->nr_write_queues + dev->nr_poll_queues;
Please avoid the overly long line here.
Otherwise this looks good to me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-22 5:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-21 13:53 [PATCH 0/3] nvme-pci: honor isolcpus configuration Daniel Wagner
2024-06-21 13:53 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched/isolation: Add io_queue housekeeping option Daniel Wagner
2024-06-22 5:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-24 7:13 ` Daniel Wagner
2024-06-24 8:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-24 9:00 ` Daniel Wagner
2024-06-25 6:37 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-06-25 7:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-06-25 8:57 ` Daniel Wagner
2024-06-30 13:47 ` Ming Lei
2024-06-21 13:53 ` [PATCH 2/3] nvme-pci: limit queue count to housekeeping cpus Daniel Wagner
2024-06-22 5:14 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2024-06-23 7:03 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-06-21 13:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] lib/group_cpus.c: honor housekeeping config when grouping CPUs Daniel Wagner
2024-06-22 5:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240622051420.GC11303@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brookxu.cn@gmail.com \
--cc=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=fweisbecker@suse.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=sbalaraman@parallelwireless.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox