From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C2CEE77197 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2025 13:49:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=kYNpoilx7wSK1OmAquEjOwqVDywqYi5WQfbhG3p32fg=; b=vvBZJ+jVO8Hx1flyIERIHQJJlQ /5o/8M3KTzthuvzYJOSzI84eElBOBAuE963Qv2s09z0DNYjxlrbqjzaHtrtSfP1wjvAfnE5dFH2Jl QO2Q5nSP5h/8LDaZOZMScDhf4X9IP1u1kkQJss6a3JhRuKtNTj781tNd7bUrGr4xL1LhHuQqSAZTx vYB0NsS9blLF64zyD+j6Sqc/FSeAhdnuzQNgV95h3vkDHFBvZDNZ+566STKMJBkuztqV3w1KgOP1u FiItAu7vREWBagk+y0b9AmiQT5Rr8hVe4yXLZxXoeTXfh64s9+gs4Un932+XiG9AKZdKRfr0/Lsqp AAFJd9Mw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tV9xT-000000053fx-2JAe; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 13:49:23 +0000 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tV9xQ-000000053fD-3fd1 for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 13:49:22 +0000 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 92DC968D05; Tue, 7 Jan 2025 14:49:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 14:49:13 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Ming Lei Cc: Nilay Shroff , Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Damien Le Moal , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, nbd@other.debian.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] block: add a store_limit operations for sysfs entries Message-ID: <20250107134913.GA22046@lst.de> References: <20250107063120.1011593-1-hch@lst.de> <20250107063120.1011593-5-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250107_054921_051669_2E811EAF X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.55 ) X-BeenThere: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-nvme" Errors-To: linux-nvme-bounces+linux-nvme=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 06:25:20PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues() freezes queue before acquiring ->syfs_lock too. > > So yes, it is a mess wrt. order between ->sysfs_lock and freezing queue. Let's sort out the current freeze vs limits lock issue first. Next step is to kill sysfs_lock in it's current form.