From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] nvme: always include <linux/key.h>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 10:01:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250128090156.GE25760@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250122165829.11603-7-hare@kernel.org>
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 05:58:25PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> To avoid build errors when NVME_KEYRING is not set.
So do the previous patches created these errors? Or following ones?
This commit message doesn't seem particularly useful. I'd expected it
to be folded into the patch that would create the build failure.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-28 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-22 16:58 [PATCHv14 00/10] nvme: implement secure concatenation Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-22 16:58 ` [PATCH 01/10] crypto,fs: Separate out hkdf_extract() and hkdf_expand() Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-22 16:58 ` [PATCH 02/10] nvme: add nvme_auth_generate_psk() Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-28 8:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-28 15:26 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-22 16:58 ` [PATCH 03/10] nvme: add nvme_auth_generate_digest() Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-28 8:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-22 16:58 ` [PATCH 04/10] nvme: add nvme_auth_derive_tls_psk() Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-28 8:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-03 13:37 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-04 5:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-22 16:58 ` [PATCH 05/10] nvme-keyring: add nvme_tls_psk_refresh() Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-28 9:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-03 13:55 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-22 16:58 ` [PATCH 06/10] nvme: always include <linux/key.h> Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-28 9:01 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-02-03 13:55 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-22 16:58 ` [PATCH 07/10] nvme-tcp: request secure channel concatenation Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-28 9:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-28 15:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-03 14:06 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-22 16:58 ` [PATCH 08/10] nvme-fabrics: reset admin connection for secure concatenation Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-22 16:58 ` [PATCH 09/10] nvmet-tcp: support secure channel concatenation Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-28 9:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-03 14:20 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-22 16:58 ` [PATCH 10/10] nvmet: add tls_concat and tls_key debugfs entries Hannes Reinecke
2025-01-23 22:13 ` [PATCHv14 00/10] nvme: implement secure concatenation Sagi Grimberg
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-12-03 11:02 [PATCHv13 " Hannes Reinecke
2024-12-03 11:02 ` [PATCH 06/10] nvme: always include <linux/key.h> Hannes Reinecke
2024-12-24 11:44 ` Sagi Grimberg
2024-12-02 14:29 [PATCHv12 00/10] nvme: implement secure concatenation Hannes Reinecke
2024-12-02 14:29 ` [PATCH 06/10] nvme: always include <linux/key.h> Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250128090156.GE25760@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hare@kernel.org \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox