From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Ruozhu Li <david.li@jaguarmicro.com>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, hch@lst.de, sagi@grimberg.me
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvmet-rdma: recheck queue state is LIVE in state lock in recv done
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 07:20:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250213062048.GD19608@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250211034543.808-1-david.li@jaguarmicro.com>
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/target/rdma.c
> @@ -1042,12 +1042,16 @@ static void nvmet_rdma_recv_done(struct ib_cq *cq, struct ib_wc *wc)
> unsigned long flags;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&queue->state_lock, flags);
> - if (queue->state == NVMET_RDMA_Q_CONNECTING)
> - list_add_tail(&rsp->wait_list, &queue->rsp_wait_list);
> - else
> - nvmet_rdma_put_rsp(rsp);
> + if (queue->state != NVMET_RDMA_Q_LIVE) {
You'll want a comment based on the commit message that the first live
check is racy.
> + if (queue->state == NVMET_RDMA_Q_CONNECTING)
> + list_add_tail(&rsp->wait_list, &queue->rsp_wait_list);
> + else
> + nvmet_rdma_put_rsp(rsp);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->state_lock, flags);
> + return;
This gets a bit messy now. What about a struture like this instead?
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/rdma.c b/drivers/nvme/target/rdma.c
index 1afd93026f9b..ae6a123ac63f 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/target/rdma.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/target/rdma.c
@@ -996,6 +996,23 @@ static void nvmet_rdma_handle_command(struct nvmet_rdma_queue *queue,
nvmet_req_complete(&cmd->req, status);
}
+static bool nvmet_rdma_recv_not_live(struct nvmet_rdma_queue *queue,
+ struct nvmet_rdma_rsp *rsp)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+ bool ret = true;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&queue->state_lock, flags);
+ if (queue->state == NVMET_RDMA_Q_LIVE)
+ ret = false;
+ else if (queue->state == NVMET_RDMA_Q_CONNECTING)
+ list_add_tail(&rsp->wait_list, &queue->rsp_wait_list);
+ else
+ nvmet_rdma_put_rsp(rsp);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->state_lock, flags);
+ return ret;
+}
+
static void nvmet_rdma_recv_done(struct ib_cq *cq, struct ib_wc *wc)
{
struct nvmet_rdma_cmd *cmd =
@@ -1038,18 +1055,9 @@ static void nvmet_rdma_recv_done(struct ib_cq *cq, struct ib_wc *wc)
rsp->n_rdma = 0;
rsp->invalidate_rkey = 0;
- if (unlikely(queue->state != NVMET_RDMA_Q_LIVE)) {
- unsigned long flags;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&queue->state_lock, flags);
- if (queue->state == NVMET_RDMA_Q_CONNECTING)
- list_add_tail(&rsp->wait_list, &queue->rsp_wait_list);
- else
- nvmet_rdma_put_rsp(rsp);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->state_lock, flags);
+ if (unlikely(queue->state != NVMET_RDMA_Q_LIVE) &&
+ nvmet_rdma_recv_not_live(queue, rsp))
return;
- }
-
nvmet_rdma_handle_command(queue, rsp);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-13 6:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-11 3:45 [PATCH] nvmet-rdma: recheck queue state is LIVE in state lock in recv done Ruozhu Li
2025-02-13 6:20 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-02-13 10:06 ` Ruozhu Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250213062048.GD19608@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=david.li@jaguarmicro.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox