From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>
Cc: James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] nvmet-fcloop: add ref counting to lport
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 15:17:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250305141740.GC18065@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250226-nvmet-fcloop-v1-2-c0bd83d43e6a@kernel.org>
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 07:45:54PM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> +static void
> +fcloop_lport_free(struct kref *ref)
> +{
> + struct fcloop_lport *lport =
> + container_of(ref, struct fcloop_lport, ref);
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&fcloop_lock, flags);
> + list_del(&lport->lport_list);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fcloop_lock, flags);
> +
> + kfree(lport);
Maybe it's just me, but I find the kref a really horrible pattern over
usig a simple refcount_t.
Otherwise adding proper refcounting looks fine.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-05 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-26 18:45 [PATCH 00/11] nvmet-fcloop: track resources via reference counting Daniel Wagner
2025-02-26 18:45 ` [PATCH 01/11] nvmet-fcloop: remove nport from list on last user Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28 7:04 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-03-05 14:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 18:45 ` [PATCH 02/11] nvmet-fcloop: add ref counting to lport Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28 7:05 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-03-05 14:17 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-03-06 9:26 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-03-06 10:06 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-02-26 18:45 ` [PATCH 03/11] nvmet-fcloop: refactor fcloop_nport_alloc Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28 7:11 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-28 7:56 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-03-05 14:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-26 18:45 ` [PATCH 04/11] nvmet-fcloop: track ref counts for nports Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28 7:19 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-28 8:09 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28 8:18 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-02-26 18:45 ` [PATCH 05/11] nvmet-fcloop: track tport with ref counting Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28 7:27 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-28 8:30 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28 14:31 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-02-26 18:45 ` [PATCH 06/11] nvmet-fcloop: track rport " Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28 7:29 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-26 18:45 ` [PATCH 07/11] nvmet-fc: update tgtport ref per assoc Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28 7:30 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-26 18:46 ` [PATCH 08/11] nvmet-fc: take tgtport reference only once Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28 7:34 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-28 8:45 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-02-26 18:46 ` [PATCH 09/11] nvmet-fc: free pending reqs on tgtport unregister Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28 7:35 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-26 18:46 ` [PATCH 10/11] nvmet-fc: inline nvmet_fc_delete_assoc Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28 7:36 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-26 18:46 ` [PATCH 11/11] nvmet-fc: inline nvmet_fc_free_hostport Daniel Wagner
2025-02-28 7:37 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-02-27 16:30 ` [PATCH 00/11] nvmet-fcloop: track resources via reference counting Daniel Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250305141740.GC18065@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=wagi@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox