From: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
To: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: hch@lst.de, kbusch@kernel.org, hare@suse.de, sagi@grimberg.me,
jmeneghi@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk, gjoyce@ibm.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/2] improve NVMe multipath handling
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 12:07:21 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250321063901.747605-1-nilay@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
Hi,
This patch series introduces improvements to NVMe multipath handling by
refining the removal behavior of the multipath head node and simplifying
configuration options. The idea/POC for this change was originally
proposed by Christoph[1] and Keith[2]. I worked upon their original
idea/POC and implemented this series.
The first patch in the series addresses an issue where the multipath
head node of a PCIe NVMe disk is removed immediately when all disk paths
are lost. This can cause problems in scenarios such as:
- Hot removal and re-addition of a disk.
- Transient PCIe link failures that trigger re-enumeration,
briefly removing and restoring the disk.
In such cases, premature removal of the head node may result in a device
node name change, requiring applications to reopen device handles if
they were performing I/O during the failure. To mitigate this, we
introduce a delayed removal mechanism. Instead of removing the head node
immediately, the system waits for a configurable timeout, allowing the
disk to recover. If the disk comes back online within this window, the
head node remains unchanged, ensuring uninterrupted workloads.
A new sysfs attribute, delayed_shutdown_sec, allows users to configure
this timeout. By default, it is set to 0 seconds, preserving the
existing behavior unless explicitly changed.
Additionally, please note that this change now always creates head disk
node for all types of NVMe disks (single-ported or multi-ported) as well
as shared/private namespaces, unless the multipath nvme-core module
parameter is explicitly set to false or CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATH is disabled.
The second patch removes the multipath module parameter parameter from
nvme-core, making native NVMe multipath support explicit. Now with first
patch changes, the multipath head node is always created, even for single-
port NVMe disks when CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATH is configured. Since this
behavior is now default, the multipath module parameter may no longer be
needed. IMO, the CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATH (native-multipath) should be the
default and non-native multipath should ideally be deprecated by now,
however I didn't remove CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATH in this series. So users
who still prefers non-native multipath can disable CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATH
at compile time. Having said that, if everyone agress we may depreacte
non-native multipath support for NVMe.
These changes should help improve NVMe multipath reliability and simplify
configuration. Feedback and testing are welcome!
PS: Yes I know this RFC is late, but the intention is to get feedback/
suggestion in the upcoming LSF/MM/BPF summit. This might be used as a
reference implementation for discussion. I also saw that we've already
got a timeslot where John is going to talk about removing NVMe multipath
config option. Maybe we could include it in that discussion, if everyone
agress.
Thanks!
--Nilay
Nilay Shroff (2):
nvme-multipath: introduce delayed removal of the multipath head node
nvme-multipath: remove multipath module param
drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 36 ++++------
drivers/nvme/host/multipath.c | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h | 5 +-
drivers/nvme/host/sysfs.c | 13 ++++
4 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
--
2.47.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-03-21 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-21 6:37 Nilay Shroff [this message]
2025-03-21 6:37 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] nvme-multipath: introduce delayed removal of the multipath head node Nilay Shroff
2025-03-22 1:48 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-03-22 22:08 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-03-25 15:21 ` John Meneghini
2025-04-07 14:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-08 14:07 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-09 10:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-18 10:45 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-22 7:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-22 9:52 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-03-21 6:37 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] nvme-multipath: remove multipath module param Nilay Shroff
2025-03-25 15:09 ` John Meneghini
2025-04-07 14:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-08 14:35 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-09 10:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-04-18 14:22 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-04-22 7:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250321063901.747605-1-nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=gjoyce@ibm.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jmeneghi@redhat.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox