From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B3D4C3ABA5 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2025 13:04:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=8KbY0DweL7rNaV0qI8g9vMm4PDDdst0OE8lEAyUoyHw=; b=MVps3a4ub0W4w1Z8UUnU6IoUuJ Prw6AfWYvmxyz+yDsKPl1U2ZaPVDyiX/BF2UWnYWiglBQU1Bbx+SEGw0ACSSTr7FriXZNnQswBXXm 8zgKzufTnP0g8vlSN6OGzOkgDrxlOgbZ0mxoZej/WKUOLHZR7AE7eqmB1hmoPNRNLT7GO3pA5Lwtx AEg4gEbHCIMmCTZvLoL3s7JrULkh/weWnisF08lbaKk5GtJmarrdWVMswF15doge9VjpxCnTWkS6Q OBl88IiOXdBrNmhWuHQjiqdxZ9QVCj2IUEJpfHh+G8Zv+ERxlvuGjhMgfp7Z86DdJsS/mDAxThOP3 +qUyV9TQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1u9O9d-00000006JQq-0u4E; Mon, 28 Apr 2025 13:04:13 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1u8w9p-000000034qb-45TK for linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 27 Apr 2025 07:10:34 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF2F61166; Sun, 27 Apr 2025 07:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7284DC4CEE3; Sun, 27 Apr 2025 07:10:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1745737832; bh=CGnsiRcgcTLWNshlRKt3+TY3846/zeQqAZXDX5kQlSo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=M96skoYCIAliV9mE/cHFjQyXeYgIKCso7ocEVoV4QwsavwZFE3rfEM0dziGcjOR6b 7kjkhtEE/0EQdgXtARUS6cI7T75h7ppRVSbbVbM6R6qxPwg9Sg1vSFr6VbnyOZQ57g o/iTgqG/YLNmmypwMR2+p+Nr3hxoD01W7r5hdZeZwzGeiH97kZ/4Ut5fcVkg1wzjts hXvK19kK7wEZSW5jdM0EDEgy9k/RevkU6uLUiXDosGVulyNXnwwR8BBoNXzP3d0oXt HjLpbmZL7Uu8naYplITM7UrID84hix6jY7jTs9NC+PEEEgVOxLpTdYZy8aECiq9kdG KVcDCKntZyoxA== Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 10:10:26 +0300 From: Leon Romanovsky To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Keith Busch , Marek Szyprowski , Jens Axboe , Jake Edge , Jonathan Corbet , Jason Gunthorpe , Zhu Yanjun , Robin Murphy , Joerg Roedel , Will Deacon , Sagi Grimberg , Bjorn Helgaas , Logan Gunthorpe , Yishai Hadas , Shameer Kolothum , Kevin Tian , Alex Williamson , =?iso-8859-1?B?Suly9G1l?= Glisse , Andrew Morton , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Niklas Schnelle , Chuck Lever , Luis Chamberlain , Matthew Wilcox , Dan Williams , Kanchan Joshi , Chaitanya Kulkarni , Nitesh Shetty Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 23/24] nvme-pci: convert to blk_rq_dma_map Message-ID: <20250427071026.GA5848@unreal> References: <7c5c5267cba2c03f6650444d4879ba0d13004584.1745394536.git.leon@kernel.org> <20250423092437.GA1895@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250423092437.GA1895@lst.de> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 05:19:59 -0700 X-BeenThere: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Linux-nvme" Errors-To: linux-nvme-bounces+linux-nvme=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 11:24:37AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I don't think the meta SGL handling is quite right yet, and the > single segment data handling also regressed. If my testing is correct, my dma-split-wip branch passes all tests, including single segment. Thanks