From: Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>
To: James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v6 12/14] nvmet-fc: free pending reqs on tgtport unregister
Date: Wed, 07 May 2025 14:23:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250507-nvmet-fcloop-v6-12-ca02e16fb018@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250507-nvmet-fcloop-v6-0-ca02e16fb018@kernel.org>
When nvmet_fc_unregister_targetport is called by the LLDD, it's not
possible to communicate with the host, thus all pending request will not
be process. Thus explicitly free them.
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>
---
drivers/nvme/target/fc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c b/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c
index 7b50130f10f6578e6e49fe8ea661de34dfbb3683..75ddb7425605dd6623db38a133b63e201592354c 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c
@@ -1580,6 +1580,39 @@ nvmet_fc_delete_ctrl(struct nvmet_ctrl *ctrl)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&nvmet_fc_tgtlock, flags);
}
+static void
+nvmet_fc_free_pending_reqs(struct nvmet_fc_tgtport *tgtport)
+{
+ struct nvmet_fc_ls_req_op *lsop;
+ struct nvmefc_ls_req *lsreq;
+ struct nvmet_fc_ls_iod *iod;
+ int i;
+
+ iod = tgtport->iod;
+ for (i = 0; i < NVMET_LS_CTX_COUNT; iod++, i++)
+ cancel_work(&iod->work);
+
+ /*
+ * After this point the connection is lost and thus any pending
+ * request can't be processed by the normal completion path. This
+ * is likely a request from nvmet_fc_send_ls_req_async.
+ */
+ while ((lsop = list_first_entry_or_null(&tgtport->ls_req_list,
+ struct nvmet_fc_ls_req_op, lsreq_list))) {
+ list_del(&lsop->lsreq_list);
+
+ if (!lsop->req_queued)
+ continue;
+
+ lsreq = &lsop->ls_req;
+ fc_dma_unmap_single(tgtport->dev, lsreq->rqstdma,
+ (lsreq->rqstlen + lsreq->rsplen),
+ DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
+ nvmet_fc_tgtport_put(tgtport);
+ kfree(lsop);
+ }
+}
+
/**
* nvmet_fc_unregister_targetport - transport entry point called by an
* LLDD to deregister/remove a previously
@@ -1608,13 +1641,7 @@ nvmet_fc_unregister_targetport(struct nvmet_fc_target_port *target_port)
flush_workqueue(nvmet_wq);
- /*
- * should terminate LS's as well. However, LS's will be generated
- * at the tail end of association termination, so they likely don't
- * exist yet. And even if they did, it's worthwhile to just let
- * them finish and targetport ref counting will clean things up.
- */
-
+ nvmet_fc_free_pending_reqs(tgtport);
nvmet_fc_tgtport_put(tgtport);
return 0;
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-07 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-07 12:22 [PATCH v6 00/14] nvmet-fcloop: track resources via reference counting Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 12:22 ` [PATCH v6 01/14] nvmet-fcloop: track ref counts for nports Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 13:50 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-05-08 10:06 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 12:22 ` [PATCH v6 02/14] nvmet-fcloop: remove nport from list on last user Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 12:22 ` [PATCH v6 03/14] nvmet-fcloop: refactor fcloop_nport_alloc and track lport Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 12:23 ` [PATCH v6 04/14] nvmet-fcloop: refactor fcloop_delete_local_port Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 12:23 ` [PATCH v6 05/14] nvmet-fcloop: update refs on tfcp_req Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 12:23 ` [PATCH v6 06/14] nvmet-fcloop: add missing fcloop_callback_host_done Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 13:51 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-05-07 12:23 ` [PATCH v6 07/14] nvmet-fcloop: access fcpreq only when holding reqlock Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 13:52 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-05-07 12:23 ` [PATCH v6 08/14] nvmet-fcloop: prevent double port deletion Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 13:59 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-05-07 12:23 ` [PATCH v6 09/14] nvmet-fcloop: allocate/free fcloop_lsreq directly Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 12:23 ` [PATCH v6 10/14] nvmet-fcloop: don't wait for lport cleanup Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 13:59 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-05-07 12:23 ` [PATCH v6 11/14] nvmet-fcloop: drop response if targetport is gone Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 12:23 ` Daniel Wagner [this message]
2025-05-07 12:23 ` [PATCH v6 13/14] nvmet-fc: take tgtport refs for portentry Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 12:23 ` [PATCH v6 14/14] nvme-fc: do not reference lsrsp after failure Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 14:00 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-05-12 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 00/14] nvmet-fcloop: track resources via reference counting Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250507-nvmet-fcloop-v6-12-ca02e16fb018@kernel.org \
--to=wagi@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox