Linux-NVME Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>
To: James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,  Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	 linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v6 12/14] nvmet-fc: free pending reqs on tgtport unregister
Date: Wed, 07 May 2025 14:23:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250507-nvmet-fcloop-v6-12-ca02e16fb018@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250507-nvmet-fcloop-v6-0-ca02e16fb018@kernel.org>

When nvmet_fc_unregister_targetport is called by the LLDD, it's not
possible to communicate with the host, thus all pending request will not
be process. Thus explicitly free them.

Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/nvme/target/fc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c b/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c
index 7b50130f10f6578e6e49fe8ea661de34dfbb3683..75ddb7425605dd6623db38a133b63e201592354c 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c
@@ -1580,6 +1580,39 @@ nvmet_fc_delete_ctrl(struct nvmet_ctrl *ctrl)
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&nvmet_fc_tgtlock, flags);
 }
 
+static void
+nvmet_fc_free_pending_reqs(struct nvmet_fc_tgtport *tgtport)
+{
+	struct nvmet_fc_ls_req_op *lsop;
+	struct nvmefc_ls_req *lsreq;
+	struct nvmet_fc_ls_iod *iod;
+	int i;
+
+	iod = tgtport->iod;
+	for (i = 0; i < NVMET_LS_CTX_COUNT; iod++, i++)
+		cancel_work(&iod->work);
+
+	/*
+	 * After this point the connection is lost and thus any pending
+	 * request can't be processed by the normal completion path. This
+	 * is likely a request from nvmet_fc_send_ls_req_async.
+	 */
+	while ((lsop = list_first_entry_or_null(&tgtport->ls_req_list,
+				struct nvmet_fc_ls_req_op, lsreq_list))) {
+		list_del(&lsop->lsreq_list);
+
+		if (!lsop->req_queued)
+			continue;
+
+		lsreq = &lsop->ls_req;
+		fc_dma_unmap_single(tgtport->dev, lsreq->rqstdma,
+				    (lsreq->rqstlen + lsreq->rsplen),
+				    DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
+		nvmet_fc_tgtport_put(tgtport);
+		kfree(lsop);
+	}
+}
+
 /**
  * nvmet_fc_unregister_targetport - transport entry point called by an
  *                              LLDD to deregister/remove a previously
@@ -1608,13 +1641,7 @@ nvmet_fc_unregister_targetport(struct nvmet_fc_target_port *target_port)
 
 	flush_workqueue(nvmet_wq);
 
-	/*
-	 * should terminate LS's as well. However, LS's will be generated
-	 * at the tail end of association termination, so they likely don't
-	 * exist yet. And even if they did, it's worthwhile to just let
-	 * them finish and targetport ref counting will clean things up.
-	 */
-
+	nvmet_fc_free_pending_reqs(tgtport);
 	nvmet_fc_tgtport_put(tgtport);
 
 	return 0;

-- 
2.49.0



  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-07 12:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-07 12:22 [PATCH v6 00/14] nvmet-fcloop: track resources via reference counting Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 12:22 ` [PATCH v6 01/14] nvmet-fcloop: track ref counts for nports Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 13:50   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-05-08 10:06     ` Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 12:22 ` [PATCH v6 02/14] nvmet-fcloop: remove nport from list on last user Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 12:22 ` [PATCH v6 03/14] nvmet-fcloop: refactor fcloop_nport_alloc and track lport Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 12:23 ` [PATCH v6 04/14] nvmet-fcloop: refactor fcloop_delete_local_port Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 12:23 ` [PATCH v6 05/14] nvmet-fcloop: update refs on tfcp_req Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 12:23 ` [PATCH v6 06/14] nvmet-fcloop: add missing fcloop_callback_host_done Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 13:51   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-05-07 12:23 ` [PATCH v6 07/14] nvmet-fcloop: access fcpreq only when holding reqlock Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 13:52   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-05-07 12:23 ` [PATCH v6 08/14] nvmet-fcloop: prevent double port deletion Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 13:59   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-05-07 12:23 ` [PATCH v6 09/14] nvmet-fcloop: allocate/free fcloop_lsreq directly Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 12:23 ` [PATCH v6 10/14] nvmet-fcloop: don't wait for lport cleanup Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 13:59   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-05-07 12:23 ` [PATCH v6 11/14] nvmet-fcloop: drop response if targetport is gone Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 12:23 ` Daniel Wagner [this message]
2025-05-07 12:23 ` [PATCH v6 13/14] nvmet-fc: take tgtport refs for portentry Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 12:23 ` [PATCH v6 14/14] nvme-fc: do not reference lsrsp after failure Daniel Wagner
2025-05-07 14:00   ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-05-12 14:16 ` [PATCH v6 00/14] nvmet-fcloop: track resources via reference counting Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250507-nvmet-fcloop-v6-12-ca02e16fb018@kernel.org \
    --to=wagi@kernel.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox