From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] nvmet: pci-epf: Cleanup nvmet_pci_epf_raise_irq()
Date: Fri, 9 May 2025 08:25:02 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250508232504.437470-4-dlemoal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250508232504.437470-1-dlemoal@kernel.org>
There is no point in taking the controller irq_lock and calling
nvmet_pci_epf_should_raise_irq() for a completion queue which does not
have IRQ enabled (NVMET_PCI_EPF_Q_IRQ_ENABLED flag is not set).
Move the test for the NVMET_PCI_EPF_Q_IRQ_ENABLED flag out of
nvmet_pci_epf_should_raise_irq() to the top of nvmet_pci_epf_raise_irq()
to return early when no IRQ should be raised.
Also, use dev_err_ratelimited() to avoid a message storm under load when
raising IRQs is failing.
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
---
drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c b/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c
index bde7818c673d..a6ccf3fcccc2 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/target/pci-epf.c
@@ -596,9 +596,6 @@ static bool nvmet_pci_epf_should_raise_irq(struct nvmet_pci_epf_ctrl *ctrl,
struct nvmet_pci_epf_irq_vector *iv = cq->iv;
bool ret;
- if (!test_bit(NVMET_PCI_EPF_Q_IRQ_ENABLED, &cq->flags))
- return false;
-
/* IRQ coalescing for the admin queue is not allowed. */
if (!cq->qid)
return true;
@@ -625,7 +622,8 @@ static void nvmet_pci_epf_raise_irq(struct nvmet_pci_epf_ctrl *ctrl,
struct pci_epf *epf = nvme_epf->epf;
int ret = 0;
- if (!test_bit(NVMET_PCI_EPF_Q_LIVE, &cq->flags))
+ if (!test_bit(NVMET_PCI_EPF_Q_LIVE, &cq->flags) ||
+ !test_bit(NVMET_PCI_EPF_Q_IRQ_ENABLED, &cq->flags))
return;
mutex_lock(&ctrl->irq_lock);
@@ -658,7 +656,9 @@ static void nvmet_pci_epf_raise_irq(struct nvmet_pci_epf_ctrl *ctrl,
}
if (ret)
- dev_err(ctrl->dev, "Failed to raise IRQ (err=%d)\n", ret);
+ dev_err_ratelimited(ctrl->dev,
+ "CQ[%u]: Failed to raise IRQ (err=%d)\n",
+ cq->qid, ret);
unlock:
mutex_unlock(&ctrl->irq_lock);
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-08 23:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-08 23:24 [PATCH v2 0/5] nvmet pci-epf fixes Damien Le Moal
2025-05-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] nvmet: pci-epf: Clear completion queue IRQ flag on delete Damien Le Moal
2025-05-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] nvmet: pci-epf: Do not fall back to using INTX if not supported Damien Le Moal
2025-05-08 23:25 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2025-05-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] nvmet: pci-epf: Improve debug message Damien Le Moal
2025-05-08 23:25 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] nvmet: pci-epf: Remove NVMET_PCI_EPF_Q_IS_SQ Damien Le Moal
2025-05-09 4:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] nvmet pci-epf fixes Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250508232504.437470-4-dlemoal@kernel.org \
--to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kch@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox